From Starvation to Abundance: A Memoir of Family and Resilience

I can’t imagine it. I’ve tried, but it’s beyond my ability. The closest I can come to imagining what it must have been like to survive the Holocaust and, against all odds, marry, have children, and live a happy life is knowing what it was like to be the child of an RCAF pilot who spent three months injured in a POW hospital in occupied France. 

I suppose it’s understandable that people can’t imagine living through such trauma themselves. It protects us. But when you’re the child of people who survived that horror, when the knowledge of what one or both of your parents experienced forms the backdrop for your entire life, lived in comfort and safety in one of the richest countries in the world—that’s a different story.

Marsha Lederman, author of the bestselling Kiss the Red Stairs: The Holocaust, Once Removed (McLelland &Stewart, 2022), which I devoured last year, was one of those children. Bonny Reichert (class of 2022, Master of Fine Arts in Creative Nonfiction, University of King’s College) was another.

For most of her life, Richert coped with the knowledge of what had happened to her father by not thinking about it. I don’t blame her. She and her father talked about one day writing a book together about it, but for one reason and another that day never came. Until one day, after a trip to her father’s native Poland and an encounter with the perfect bowl of borscht, Reichert realized the time had come. 

The result of that realization is How to Share an Egg: A True Story of Hunger, Love, and Plenty (Appetite by Random House, 2025). A memoir with strong culinary overtones, How to Share an Egg shares with the reader that good food has played an important role in the author’s life, not only because, as the daughter of a successful restaurateur, she grew up with excellent cooking but because her father had very nearly starved to death. 

The preface to the book opens like this:

Imagine two boys—a couple of skeletons, really—roaming the German countryside. One is fourteen, the other, a little older. It’s the spring of 1945, and they haven’t eaten much besides potato peels and coffee grounds for three years. They knock on door after door until they find a farmer who goes into his kitchen and brings something back: a single brown egg. One egg for two starving boys. … 

The book you’re about to read is a tale of hunger and sorrow and love. It’s a mishmash of what happened to my dad and what’s happened to me; a portrait of a parent and a child, a father and a daughter. It’s both a small story and an enormous one, a study of contrasts. And because it’s my family, it’s a story about food—sumptuous meals and meals of almost nothing at all; food that is simple and complicated, basic and bountiful. Food that is rife with meaning.

How does a daughter reconcile her privilege when her father had nothing? How does she set her table, heavy with plenty, when her ancestors were lucky to share a single egg? As much about survival as sustenance, the story you’re about to read is about a family that lost everything and built itself up again, one meal at a time. 

I sometimes worry that recent generations simply don’t know enough about the Holocaust. I worry about the way this lack of knowledge has been fuelling a global resurgence in antisemitism. I’m heartened by the appearance of books by the children of survivors, like Reichert. If there was ever a book to teach about that shameful period in human history while making you go from laughing to crying and back again, this is surely it. 

Books about the Holocaust:

Wanda’s War: An Untold Story of Nazi Europe, Forced Labour, and a Canadian Immigration Scandal, by Marsha Faubert. Review coming soon.

One in Six Million: The Baby by the Roadside and the Man Who Retraced a Holocaust Survivor’s Lost Identity, by Amy Fish. Review coming soon.

A Memoir of Faith: Insights from a Minister’s Wife

I’m not religious. Which doesn’t mean I don’t have faith. My faith is atheism. I believe what we see is what we get, we have one chance to leave a positive impact on the people around us, and our afterlife is what we leave behind in those people’s hearts and minds. 

It also doesn’t mean I don’t respect other people’s faiths. I do, very much. Even when I don’t understand their religious choices, as I don’t understand all the choices the Muslim women Sheima Benembarek wrote about in Halal Sex, I respect their right to make those choices, free of judgment. Which is probably why a diehard atheist like me got so much out of a book of essays written by a devoted Christian. 

Karen Stiller (class of 2018), author of The Minister’s Wife: A Memoir of Faith, Doubt, Friendship, Loneliness, Forgiveness, and More (Tyndale, 2020), has written a book filled with stories about what it’s like to be married to a member of the clergy—the burden of other people’s (and her own) unrealistic expectations, the wish that sometimes people would just stop talking to her and leave her alone, the loneliness of being unable to find a friend in one’s own community, the disappointment when her husband’s career takes the family places they’d rather not go instead of where they’d love to go. 

Stiller not only offers insight into what that life is really like, but she does so in an I-bet-you’re-more-fun-at-a-party-than-anyone-might-guess authorial voice, which she combines with a self-deprecating sense of humour that makes you wish that party was happening tonight. In a chapter on family, Stiller weighs in on what it’s like raising three human beings who are blessed and burdened with being minister’s children: 

The messes and misses are what Brent and I remember the most, what touch us so deeply—our clumsy selves just trying to do our best. There are so many real things that we did wrong, especially me with all my yelling. 

I wish I had never once shouted. I also wish they had not stretched plastic wrap around the living room lamps as I watched, helpless, while interviewing someone on the phone for a magazine article I was writing about whether or not spanking was a good thing. I wished they had not dumped a can of beans in their brother’s bed, or put all my bras in the freezer on April Fools’ Day. I wished that a frog had not been dropped in a sink full of dishes because, as it turns out, frogs die in hot, soapy water. …

I also wish I had done those things I had planned to do, like cooking a meal from a different country every week, learning about the culture together (sitting quietly, taking turns reading out loud), and praying for the people who lived there (sitting quietly, taking turns praying out loud). I did not do that, not even on one single Wednesday evening. That was an idea I had before we had kids, something nice to do with your puppy maybe.

This is a deeply human book, a book I chuckled along with as I recognized, against all odds, how much Stiller’s life reminded me of mine, a book I feared I wouldn’t enjoy (and then wouldn’t know what to write about) but instead ended up reading in one sitting. It’s the kind of book I like to read when I’m awake at 3 AM, much as I like reading Richard Wagamese’s gentle memoirs-in-essays, so that its kind and soothing message can take my mind off the troubles racing like squirrels around my brain—and allow me to find my way back to an untroubled rest.  

Books about faith:

Halal Sex: The Intimate Lives of Muslim Women in North America, by Sheima Benembarek.

The Scientist and the Psychic: A Son’s Exploration of His Mother’s Gift, by Christian Smith.

Exploring Muslim Women’s Sexuality in “Halal Sex”

This post is the latest in an ongoing project to read and review the books written as the major project of graduates of the University of King’s College Master of Fine Arts in Creative Nonfiction Writing.

With Ramadan starting February 28, I thought this week’s blog post would give a nod to the Muslim faith. I’m not sure what I expected when I started reading Halal Sex: The Intimate Lives of Muslim Women in North America (Viking, 2023) by Sheima Benembarek (class of 2020), but what I found was so much better than anything I imagined. 

As a baby boomer who grew up in the seventies, I always thought of myself as a person who didn’t have too many sexual hangups. As a middle-class white woman who grew up in a secular Christian household, I had many preconceived notions (largely wrong) about Muslim women. So, it was a surprise to me to read the stories of a half-dozen Muslim women who are forging their own paths sexually. 

Hind is a self-described niqabi—she wears the full body-covering niqab, with only her hands and eyes showing, which she chose because she tired of being subject to the male gaze. I’m guessing many if not most Western women think of the niqab as a sign of women’s oppression. I let go of a friendship years ago because the person in question said outright that she had no respect for women who wore even a headscarf for religious reasons because they were submitting to male oppression. But the male gaze can be oppressing too and I understand the perspective that covering up might have a freeing effect.

Regardless, underneath her niqab, you never know what colour HInd’s hair might be—turquoise, maybe—as she practices a form of self-expression that’s meaningful to her. She’s also in an unusual marital situation—divorced from her first husband, now sharing her second husband with another woman (her idea), but living separately and independently because she doesn’t get along with his first wife. Her husband spends two days a week with her and the rest of the time with his other wife and children. (I could deal with such a relationship.) She has an abundant sexual appetite but her first husband didn’t, which was one of the reasons they went their separate ways. And despite the conservatism of her faith, she’s very open in talking about sexuality and educating young people in her community about it. 

Benembarek writes skillfully about a half-dozen women who are expressing their sexual identity in their own ways. Like Azar, a nonbinary transgender Sufi, which Benembarek describes as the hippy group of Islam. And Bunmi, a black bisexual Texan Muslim of Nigerian heritage who gave up the headscarf and can now be found roller skating and smoking a joint.  And Eman, who’s “one half of a popular Jewish-Palestinian lesbian comedy duo who, after marrying, combined their last names and professionally call themselves the El-Salomons.” 

And then there’s Khadijah who,

sashays back and forth in her cherry red pleather thigh-high boots, watching herself in the floor-length mirrors in front of and behind her. It takes practice to stay up on those eight-inch heels and even more practice to confidently swing around on a pole in them. The boots are made of polyvinyl chloride, a durable type of plastic; she wears stockings to avoid sweating profusely and to ease the labour of peeling them off. Her brown curls are conveniently out of the way and up in a messy bun, and she adjusts a sheer black cape that’s not long enough to conceal her frilly black high-rise panties. …

Khadijah worries her pole dancing isn’t as sophisticated as the other women’s; she has more experience in burlesque. She’s the only woman of colour dancing in the studio that afternoon, and the combination of leather and black and red fabrics suits her. The stern yet sultry look she’s putting on does too.

None of these women are what would come to my mind if you had asked me to describe a Muslim woman before reading Halal Sex. But then, if there’s anything I love in any book, it’s the opportunity to learn. For me, Halal Sex was all about learning. 

Books with a feminist leaning:

Every Boy I Ever Kissed: A Memoir, by Nellwyn Lampert.

No Place To Go: How Public Toilets Fail Our Private Needs, by Lezlie Lowe.

Highway of Tears: A True Story of Racism, Indifference and the Pursuit of Justice for Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls, by Jessica McDiarmid.

F Bomb: Dispatches from the War on Feminism, by Lauren McKeon.

Conspiracy of Hope: The Truth About Breast Cancer Screening, by Reneé Pellerin.

Heartbroken: A Journey Through Loss and Love

Every year for Christmas, everyone in my family puts together a wish list. For the past several years, my list has included whatever books have been published by graduates of King’s University’s MFA in creative nonfiction, minus whichever of those I’ve already read. The list keeps growing—it now includes more than 50 books, of which I’ve read about half—so which ones appear under the Christmas tree is increasingly a surprise.

For Christmas 2023, one of the books was Laura Pratt’s Heartbroken: Field Notes on a Constant Condition (Random House Canada, 2023). I started reading it soon after Christmas. But then a new relationship I was in, for which I had high hopes, ended abruptly and I didn’t have the heart to continue. 

I picked it up again in the summer when I was travelling. Overall, the trip didn’t go well. There was a death in the family right before I left, I had my phone and wallet stolen while I was on a train to northern Scotland, and my sailing charter around the Inner Hebrides was cut short because of gale-force winds, including the tail end of Hurricane Ernesto. Not my best trip ever. 

Reading Heartbroken was a high point while confined below decks to escape the weather. With my own sad relationship a few months into the rearview, Pratt’s book helped me deal with the dregs of my feelings about it. The back cover sums the book up this way: 

“When Laura Pratt’s long-distance partner of six years tells her ‘it’s over’ at a busy downtown train station, she is sent reeling, the breakup coming out of the blue. He, meanwhile, closes himself off, refusing to acknowledge Laura and her requests for explanation. 

“In the following days, months, and then years, Laura struggles to make sense of the sudden ending, alone and filled with questions. A journalist, she seeks to understand the freefall that is heartbreak and how so many before her survived it, drawing on forces across time and form, and uncovers literary, philosophical, scientific, and psychological accounts of the mysterious alchemy of how we human beings fall in love in the first place, and why, when it ends, some of us take longer to get over it, or never do. She weaves this background of cultural history with her own bracing story of passionate love and its loss, and offers some hope for arriving—changed, broadened, grateful—on the other side.” 

What I enjoyed most about this book was the way Pratt weaves together the story of her all-encompassing loss with minute details of a vibrant and passionate love affair unfolding in a club in Toronto, an apartment in Montreal, the Laurentian Mountains, the streets of New Orleans, and anywhere else the couple’s whimsy took them. And then she enlivens the lyrical quality of her own prose with snippets of poetry, fiction, and research on everything from stages of grief to the history of love and the science of memory. In a chapter on happiness, she writes:

This was a beautiful, heartbreaking book. I recommend it to readers of all ages who have loved, whether or not they have also lost. 

PS. Closing in on a year after my four-month relationship ended, I still find myself wrestling with what went wrong, waiting for the day I can simply say “It was fun while it lasted” and leave it at that. 

Books about love and loss:

One Strong Girl: Surviving the Unimaginable—A Mother’s Memoir, by S. Lesley Buxton.

Still, I Cannot Save You: A Memoir of Sisterhood, Love, and Letting Go, by Kelly S. Thompson.

International Medical Graduates: Opportunity vs. Stupidity

I wanted to respond to this column by The Globe and Mail health columnist André Picard last week—a bit off topic for my blog but not for me personally, as will become clear. 

My son is a pediatrician. He graduated from St. George’s University School of Medicine in Grenada. There are many stereotypes about doctors coming out of Caribbean schools being less qualified than those trained in Canada. They are false. All doctors working in Canada must demonstrate the same capacity by passing stiff exams at each of four stages: entrance into medical school, entrance into residency, entrance into the profession, and board certification.

A candidate who fails at any one of these stages may not go onto the next and may therefore not qualify to practice medicine in Canada. Candidates who were educated, trained, and have worked in countries where the medical system is significantly different than our own must undergo rigorous education and training to practice up to the standards that make Canada’s medical system globally enviable. But in terms of qualifications, these candidates are not the same as candidates who were educated and trained in systems that may operate on a slightly different model but produce physicians that are equally as qualified as those who attend Canadian medical schools.

medical stethoscope

I can’t speak to medical schools in England, Ireland, and Australia, where the quality of medical care is similar to ours in Canada. I can only speak to what I know about as a result of the fact that my son attended a Caribbean school, a school that has overcome significant prejudice to become a prestigious medical school in its own right.

So, what’s the educational difference for physicians who graduate from a medical school in Canada or one in the Caribbean?* 

First, it’s important to note that medical schools operating in the Caribbean are, for all intents and purposes, USian schools. Students do their first two years at campuses in the West Indies, where the cost of building, operating, and maintaining a medical school is lower than in the US or Canada. They then go onto internships, their first shot at hands-on practice under the strict guidance of experienced physicians, at USian hospitals, where the standards of care are very similar to our standards in Canada.

So, what’s the difference that gets students from basic sciences through internships to graduation and residencies (the second stage of hands-on practice)? It’s basically that Canadian and Caribbean schools use a different operating model, as do medical schools that operate within the geographical US.

In Canada and the geographical US, a student’s credentials for admission to medical school must be the crème de la crème of each year’s pool of applicants. But as Canadian and US-based medical schools operate on a pass-fail basis, once a candidate has been accepted, it’s unusual for them to flunk out. 

And the overall credentials for any pool of applicants are influenced by more than quality. For example, the makeup of a particular graduating class might be heavily influenced by economic conditions at the time they applied. This was the case, for example, during the 2008 recession, when jobs were so scarce that people in many fields were accepting positions well below their qualifications and at lesser pay than they might have been offered months earlier (I knew some of them). 

At that time, many young people went back to school to improve their qualifications. (I was working in international education at the time and had direct knowledge of this.) Suddenly, for reasons having nothing to do with their qualifications, the pools of candidates increased, and many applicants didn’t make it into schools that might have accepted them just months earlier. 

I don’t know if Caribbean schools experienced a bumper crop of applicants at that time, but it would make sense that they did because of their operating model. To gain entrance, one must pass the same rigorous exam as is the basic requirement for all students, but other entrance qualifications may not be as stringent. For example, a student might have just barely passed their exam, might have less volunteer experience in their application, or might not have done as well in the interview. 

Does that mean students graduating from these schools are less qualified than those graduating from Canadian schools? Not at all. Caribbean schools operate on a model that accepts students from around the world whose entrance qualifications may be lower than required by Canadian schools. But then, unlike in Canadian schools where it’s near-impossible to flunk out, their progress is graded at every turn.

blood pressure pump

This gives the students an opportunity to improve on any deficiencies in their entrance requirements and repeatedly show that they deserve their spot in the school. It also contributes to a very high attrition rate, which can top out at around 60%.

This is not cheap for students. At the time my son completed his education, the cost was $400,000 USD, easily four times higher than a Canadian school. And students who flunk out don’t get a refund on what they’ve paid for their year.

The most-qualified applicants are offered significant scholarships to encourage them to attend. However, given the schools’ global focus, the largest scholarships typically go to students from majority world** countries who couldn’t otherwise afford to attend but who will take their education back to their home countries to improve life there—a fair system if I’ve ever heard of one. 

After finishing their two years of basic sciences, students complete their internships at hospitals in the US. In contrast to students who attend Canadian or US-based schools, this gives them an opportunity to do part of their internships at different hospitals, working under different doctors and different systems and exposing them to a wide range of perspectives, which I see as a bonus to this system.

In other words, students who make it through the rigorous program of studies at Caribbean-based schools are at least as qualified as students who attend school at a Canadian or US-based medical school, if not in some ways more so.

Yet the column I linked to at the beginning of this post was titled “International med school graduates are an untapped resource, as well as a complex challenge.” In it, Picard writes:

“It’s important to note that there are two types of IMGs. The first are Canadians who study medicine abroad in places like Grenada, Ireland and Australia, usually because they weren’t accepted to Canadian schools. They argue they have a “constitutional right” to compete for residency spots on an equal footing with Canadian grads if they pass Canadian exams.

“The second type of IMGs are those educated in other countries who emigrate to Canada. If they do so before residency, they have little chance of getting a spot. (The exception is grads from countries like Saudi Arabia, who “buy” residency spots but must return home after training – a topic for another day.)

“We limit the number of doctors we train because money isn’t unlimited. We already have 97,384 physicians in Canada, and spend $32.5-billion annually paying them. Rationing is a reality.

“If we want more doctors, then one avenue is to open more residency spots for IMGs. A report last year from a group of independent senators recommended adding 750 spots, essentially doubling the current number.

“Of the group of IMGs who have trained and worked in other countries before emigrating to Canada, some of them could start work tomorrow while others do not have the appropriate qualifications. The challenge for regulators is to figure out who’s who.

“The path to practice has many hurdles: demonstrating you graduated from a legitimate medical school, having your credentials verified, passing Canadian exams, showing competency in English, having your competency tested and finding a job.”

I agree that ensuring the IMGs who lived, trained, and worked in other countries before coming to Canada must be carefully vetted before working as physicians in Canada, and doing so can be complicated. But when it comes to Canadian students who simply went overseas to train in systems that operate on a slightly different model but graduate physicians who are equally as qualified as those who study at Canadian schools, as demonstrated by the rigorous screening they must go through before practising in Canada, I fail to see the challenge. As the first link in the above quote (to SOCASMA, the Society of Canadians Studying Medicine Abroad) notes:

“Currently, provincial Ministries of Health allow Canadian medical schools to control selection for entry level training jobs called medical residencies. Canadian medical schools have used this power to exclude qualified Canadians from competing against their graduates for these positions.

“Canadians who have studied medicine anywhere but Canada and the U.S.A. are prohibited from competing against their peers who graduated from Canadian and American medical schools. They can only compete in the IMG (international medical graduate) stream, and only if they agree to enter into return of service contracts. The IMG stream is a very limited opportunity stream.

“In British Columbia, only 4 out of 65 medical disciplines are available to Canadians who have international medical degrees despite passing the national medical knowledge and clinical skills exams.

“Canadians, who choose to study overseas, and other international medical graduates, are treated as second class citizens when it comes to competing for positions in one of the most prestigious callings in Canada. The two-class system of medical residency selection currently in place is an affront to the fabric of Canadian society. This type of class system feeds the growth of a culture of entitlement and it feeds prejudice, both of which are destructive to a free and democratic society. It also prevents Canada from hiring the most qualified Canadian physicians. This impacts access to health care and the quality of health care for all Canadians.”

The blocks to this stream of IMGs practising in Canada are, to avoid mincing words, stupid. At a time when 6.5 million Canadians lack access to a physician, the rules and regulations that categorize Canadian graduates of fully accredited medical schools abroad along with physicians who graduated from medical schools that cannot hold their own in the Canadian system are, not to put too fine a point on it, stupid. 

I fully understand and agree with the need to ensure physicians practising in Canada are qualified to practice at a level commensurate with our own graduates. But the existing system miscategorizes graduates of a system where the only differences are that a) Canadian students study outside our borders, b) students who under perform can flunk out at any stage of the game, and c) students pay for the full cost of their education themselves rather than having it subsidized by Canadian taxpayers. 

This creates disadvantages that affect all of us. It needs to change. 6.5 million Canadians who don’t have a physician of their own can’t afford for it not to change. 

(*There may be other differences between schools in Canada and other countries, such as Ireland or the UK. For example, some countries do not require doctors to complete an undergraduate degree before applying to medical school, as we do in Canada, but admit students directly from secondary school into a pre-med program and from there into medical school.)

(**I prefer the terms majority world and minority world countries to value-laden terms like first world and third world or developed/industrial world and developing world. Majority and minority world reflect the reality that the world’s wealth is concentrated in the pockets of the minority populations of a few countries, while the majority of the world lives in poverty that most of us in countries like Canada and US can’t even imagine. I like the way these terms, which I first encountered in a magazine called The New Internationalist and which I highly recommend, force people to stop and think about what’s really going on in the world.)

Enhancing Access to Public Toilets for All

Continuing my meander through the 50+ books published out of the MFA program in Creative Nonfiction at University of King’s College …

If you’re a parent, you know what it’s like to be out somewhere, anywhere, when your young child suddenly needs a toilet … and there are none to be found. This was the repeated experience Lezlie Lowe (class of 2016) had when she had young children, and it was what she chose to write about when she undertook her master’s degree in creative nonfiction.

cover of book No Place to Go with image of empty toilet paper roll.

An easy-flowing read replete with really good bathroom humour, No Place to Go: How Public Toilets Fail Our Private Needs (Coach House Books, 2018) was an eye opener for me. I’ve raised three children, but I’d never thought of all the reasons people need public restrooms. The text on the back of the book mentions some of the people being failed by a global lack of attention to one of people’s most basic needs. People like “the homeless who, faced with no place to go sometimes must literally take to the streets,” a problem that became even more pronounced during the Covid pandemic. And “people with invisible disabilities, like Crohn’s disease, who stay home rather than risk soiling themselves on public transit.” 

That one got me. I have Crohn’s disease, which flared up right around the time I started the MFA program. It was embarrassing having to get up and go to the toilet several times during morning lectures and mentor groups, but at least we were in a building with toilets nearby. If I’d been at home … let’s just say I would have stayed at home all morning. 

But public restrooms fail a lot of people, like girls who need a bathroom right now when their period suddenly gushes through their pad or tampon. And trans people, who face bigotry every time they use a public restroom. Women are habitually underserved by bathroom stalls that are equal in number to men’s urinals. Several studies calling for “potty parity” argue that, considering clothing differences, menstruation, and anatomy, women’s washrooms should have twice as many stalls as men’s have urinals. 

Parents of children still in diapers become very aware of the need to find a clean and dry place to lay a child down for a change, especially if it’s a messy one. And don’t get me started on pay toilets. I thought these monstrosities were things of the past until I went to Scotland during the summer of 2024 and found myself without the appropriate coinage to answer nature’s call in a public mall. 

There are solutions, and Lowe writes about one of the best: “The Portland Loo is a vandalism-proof, twenty-four-hour flush-toilet enclosure. An anti-tech fix for on-street public bathrooms. The Loos are simple, oval-shaped rooms with a toilet. They’re spacious enough to fit strollers, wheelchairs, and even bikes. In contrast to the high-tech entrances, timers, and air-conditioning systems at work in conventional APTS [automatic public toilets] like those in Toronto and New York, Portland Loos are naturally lit and ventilated and completely off grid. They also happen to be an example of the successful use of crime prevention through environmental design—louvred sides allow people on the outside to see that there’s someone inside while maintaining privacy, and exterior handwashing sinks get people right out after they use them.” Best of all, they’re designed for everyone. Free to use, taxpayer supported. A true public service. 

Bathroom sign for men and women

It may just be the phenomenon that once you become aware of something, it seems to start popping up all around you all the time, but it seems to me that the tide toward more and better public toilets is slowly turning. And Lowe’s book might very well have had something to do with that. I can’t think of a better reason to be a writer. 

Photo by Possessed Photography on Unsplash

“I never would have thought of that” books:

Craigdarroch Castle in 21 Treasures, by Moira Dann.

The Fruitful City: The Enduring Power of the Urban Food Forest, by Helena Moncrieff.

The Worst Songs in the World: The Terrible Truth about National Anthems, by David Pate.

The Complex Emotional Terrain of Gift-Giving

I’ve long been intrigued by rules and expectations around gift-giving. In my family growing up, gift-giving was uncomplicated. You bought or made something you thought the recipient would like. 

Your only expectation in giving it was that the recipient would appreciate the thought that went into it even if they didn’t appreciate the gift itself. And if there was something specific about the gift that didn’t work—it was the wrong size, or you already had one—it was not a personal sleight for the recipient to exchange it for something that worked. 

I had no idea gifts could be used to hurt people until I was an adult. Then I met my husband’s mother. I don’t recall her giving me anything for Christmas or my birthday for the first three years I was with her son; why would she? We lived together (unmarried) and I was the wrong faith (atheist). She didn’t like me. 

Scissors, ribbon, and paper to wrap a gift.

We got married on December 7, 1983. For Christmas that year, we flew from Vancouver, where we’d moved after my mother had a health crisis, to Kingston, where my partner had grown up and his mother still lived. It was our first Christmas with his family since he’d moved away from them two years earlier.

For Christmas, my MIL gave me a nightgown and a housecoat. The nightgown was an odd choice because she knew I slept in the nude; I ignored the obvious hint. I did need a new housecoat, and I tried to be grateful for this one (and wore it until it wore out) even though it wasn’t at all my style. 

A few days later, I saw both garments on sale at Woolworth’s, the nightgown for $9.99 and the housecoat for $19.99. This would have been a day or two after my husband’s birthday, for which she gave him a plush, Pierre Cardin housecoat with the $60 price tag still pinned into the neck. (This was 1983, when $60 was worth about a billion in today’s dollars.) I’m not sure how she could have given me a more obvious message that marrying into her family did not mean that I was on the same level as anyone else in the family, a message my husband confirmed was likely exactly what she meant. After that, she only gave me gifts if my husband pushed her to. A few years later, he told her that he’d taken to sharing his annual birthday cheque from her 50/50 with me. Shortly after that, she stopped sending him anything.

One family member on my side was an absolute genius at buying gifts. She loved flea markets and kept her eyes open year-round for gifts her loved ones, especially the young children, might enjoy. She didn’t always hit the mark, but even when she was miles off base, we all valued her gifts because we knew she put a tremendous amount of thought into them. Unfortunately, she and her partner were not always as good at receiving gifts. I think they assumed that because we always showered them with praise for the gifts they offered, knowing this meant a great deal to them, they assumed that they always hit the mark. They further assumed that if others didn’t hit the mark with them, that meant they weren’t trying very hard.

Silver ribbon tied in a bow.

They were not easy to buy for. But on one occasion, I thought I really had gotten it right with a colourful wall hanging in a particular South American folk style. The look of disappointment on their faces when they opened it said everything. At some point, they said they didn’t want to exchange gifts anymore because they couldn’t afford it, and I’m sure that was part of it. But I think it was also that we could just never figure out what they’d appreciate, and they grew tired of that.

In the past few years, I admit I’ve begun to tire of gift giving. Our annual Christmas wish list has turned into a list of hyperlinks to exactly the gift the individual wants. I’ve never been a fan of buying gifts because I like them regardless of whether I think the recipient will like them. But neither am I a fan of people being so particular about what they want that all the mystery and surprise of gift-giving is gone. I

This brings me to the latest issue, which started with one person refusing a gift. They had a reason, which I didn’t understand, but it was a cash gift, so it was easy enough to redeposit. Months later, when I thought the reason for refusing the gift had passed—my bad for not checking my assumptions—I brought back gifts from a trip that I planned to give everyone for Christmas. I needed to give one of the gifts a good deal sooner than Christmas because it would spoil.

The intended recipient took pains to refuse my gifts in a very polite text. But I still found their refusal … confusing. I ended up giving the spoilable item to someone else. As to the other item, the would-be recipient suggested that I enjoy it myself. But I would never buy something at that price point for myself. So, I’ve decided to keep it for them. It will only improve with age. If they won’t accept it before I die, I’ll leave it to them in my will. 

I have to say again that the person who refused my gifts was not in any way rude in the way they refused them. Yet I’ve still spent a lot of time puzzling over my own hurt response to this. It’s been suggested to me that no one is obligated to accept a gift, which is certainly true. It’s been suggested that my difficulty in accepting this refusal is the opposite of showing love. It’s been suggested that I shouldn’t allow gift-giving to become a source of conflict.

I’ll be perfectly honest in saying I don’t know what’s right, but the whole situation led me to thinking about gift-giving in general. So I did a bit of research (emphasis on “a bit”).

Gift-giving goes back millennia and serves a variety of purposes: gifts to gods in exchange for a bountiful harvest or an edge in battle. Gifts to leaders of other clans or tribes or nations to establish friendship and trust. Gifts at weddings to bless the marriage with fecundity, at births to pray for long and happy life, at anniversaries and birthdays to express a wish for more of the same. 

The most famous anthropologist to study gift-giving was Marcel Mauss, who wrote an essay, appropriately called “The Gift“, that examines the ways gift exchange builds social and economic relationships. Mauss’s student, the famous Claude Lévi-Strauss, posited that structures such as kinship systems, commerce, and gift exchange are similar across cultures. Other anthropologists and psychologists have noted that in building social and economic bonds—yes, the value of the gifts exchanged is part of it, in much the same way that the food served and clothing worn at a state event are part of it—gifts form part of the glue that binds cultures, and individuals, together.

A web page called “The Psychology of Gifting” lists a half-dozen reasons why people give gifts: to build and reinforce relationships, to show love and devotion, for symbolic communication, to receive something in return, to help others, or to find a mate. It also lists four main types of gifts: those that are symbolic of the giver and receiver, those that are symbolic of the giver’s knowledge of the receiver, those that are symbolic of the occasion, and those that contain an array of significant meanings.

There’s a reason virtually every national capital in the world has an inventory of gifts received from other nations, gifts no one will ever use because they belong to no one person and that’s not their function. Such gifts are offers of friendship and trust, offers for two nations to let down their guard and establish mutually beneficial relationships.

Similarly, personal gift-giving is an act of both reaching out and welcoming in. We let down our guard, show our vulnerability. In giving a gift, we hope the recipient will receive it in the spirit in which it’s intended. The harder we work at finding the perfect gift, the greater our anticipation of the recipient’s pleasure—and the deeper our disappointment if it’s not received with the joy we’d hoped for.

When people don’t show their appreciation for a gift, much less when they simply refuse it, it hurts. And it hurts all the more because the gift-giver’s guard is already down. Rejection of the gift feels very much like personal rejection.

Sometimes in a scenario like that, people express their hurt by getting angry and looking for explanations. What happened to what they thought was a mutually trusting and caring relationship? And that hurts even more. 

What’s especially interesting to me about this situation is that I, as the person whose gift has been refused, am considered the one who’s at fault. Why am I making something out of nothing? Who am I to make the other person feel bad? If only I would have accepted the rejection without saying anything, everything would have been all right. There’s no responsibility on the person who refused the gift to recognize how that might have felt to me. There’s only a responsibility on me to accept the rejection graciously.

I still believe gift exchange, whether it’s interpersonal or international, is valuable.

It left me wondering, briefly, if gift-giving is worth it, if letting down one’s guard is worth it. 

I still think it is. Although I’m still feeling hurt about the current situation, which has ballooned out of all proportion at a time of year when, in my culture, we’re supposed to be appreciating one another, I still believe gift exchange, whether it’s interpersonal or international, is valuable. Just as I think, and history demonstrates, that gift exchange serves many valuable purposes, talking through misunderstandings in gift exchange provide an equally valuable opportunity to communicate about our differences and similarities and come to new understandings.

But to do that, both parties need to agree to set aside hard feelings and listen to those they’ve hurt. That’s never easy. But another thing I’ve always believed is that the harder things are to do, the more worthwhile they’re likely to be. So I’ll wait until the other party is ready to talk, and then I’ll listen and hope they’ll do the same.

Reflections on the December 6 Massacre: A Personal Account

I wrote this piece years ago about the impact the December 6 massacre had on my life. It was published in The Ottawa Citizen on December 4, 1993, just four years after the massacre. Although there are a few things I’d change or add, for the most part it still resonates, so I thought I’d share it today on the anniversary of the 1989 massacre of 14 women at École Polytechnique. 

One night a few years ago I lay frightened in bed. Someone in the parking lot was throwing something repeatedly at my window. While my rational side felt it was just a friendly prank, my mother-bear instinct told me to restrain my curious three-year-old from going to look. What if more than a mischievous smile came through the window, but a brick—or worse?

I’d seen a news feature on violence against women that night. Two weeks earlier, I’d wept over the death of my dog, a Doberman that had provided me with comfort and security for nine years.

During that time, I had almost forgotten the menacing possibilities of unexplained creaks and groans in the floor boards of an aging home. For the first time in years, I remembered what it was like to feel unsafe in my own bed. My little girl curled up to me and said, “Mommy, I wish Blue didn’t die. I wish Daddy was home.”

My children’s father is by no means perfect, but like an increasing number of his peers, he has decided that respect for others and ongoing self-examination should be a cornerstone of his life. Here is a man who is light years beyond “helping out.” He does his share. When I wanted a home birth, he trusted my instinct. When he heard a disc jockey make light of “Take Back the Night” activities, he registered his complaint with the station management.

That night, I agreed with my daughter. I wished her Daddy was home.

The wish, and the fear, lasted only moments. The lock rattled. The front door opened. Footsteps mounted the darkened stairs. A mans’ form paused outside my half-open bedroom door before pushing it open.

“Hi honey, I’m home,” my husband whispered. “Didn’t you hear me throwing things at the window?”

It was the night of Dec. 6, the second anniversary of Marc Lepine’s massacre of 14 women, and the first national day of memorial to female victims of male violence.

“I got lots of comments on my white ribbon today,” he said. “The women were pleased to see it. A couple of the guys wished they’d thought of it. I was surprised how many of the kids knew what it meant. Did anyone comment on yours?”

Heart still racing, I replied no, no one had taken notice.

We live in a word in which property ownership is wealth and wealth is power; in which 80 per cent of the work, paid or unpaid, is done by women, while 99 per cent of the property is owned by men; in which men have the ability to exert both fiscal and physical power over women; in which Marc Lepine is far from alone in instilling fear in women because of his choice to abuse that power.

In this work, it is incumbent upon me to understand life through the eyes of men like my father, who, though never abusive, believed and acted as if he was superior to my mother; men like the ones who abused me as a child, an adolescent, and a woman; even men, like my husband, who strive to behave differently, but don’t always know how.

There is no parallel requisite for them to see the world through my eyes.

My husband’s actions that night are illustrative. He requires neither physical, emotional, nor fiscal superiority over me in order to feel masculine. While he wishes that the economic value of children-rearing was recognized, he respects its intrinsic value as much as if I received remuneration. He does not silently tolerate sexist remarks.

On that December evening, this man committed an act of awareness: He wore a white ribbon. Then he came home and committed an act of unawareness.

Acting aware is a good first step. But for my husband to be aware of what it is to be a woman in 20th-century North America, he must find a way to experience the fear that I live with every day. The panic to which I’ve grown accustomed through years of practice. The heart-quickening anxiety I feel when a guy in a muscle car slows down to take a better look, when heavy footsteps quicken behind me on an empty street, when a stranger—or even a neighbour—knocks on my door in the middle of an evening when I’m home alone, not even a dog to keep me company.

As I lay frightened in bed that night a few years ago, I reviewed my choices: Stay put or go look. If I looked, I knew I’d probably see a friendly smile; or I might be confronted by a man reminded by that evening’s newscasts of his anger at women. If I stayed put, I could be teaching fear to my daughter; or I could be assured that I was protecting the two of us from anger that strikes enough ordinary Canadian women to fill a room in the time it takes to watch a Schwarzenegger video.

If I looked, I might later hear a police officer, doctor or judge berating me for taking unnecessary chances, for assuming that my own home could protect me and my young children from harm. If I stayed put, I could hear the voice in my own head chastising me for consenting to live my life in fear.

Being aware of every move, every minute is the reality of the world through women’s eyes. It is a reality I try daily to share with my husband, one he must find a way to learn and share with other men if it is to change in his little girl’s lifetime. It’s the reason that men like him, who start by wearing white ribbons on Dec. 6, must not stop there.

It’s why Dec. 6 will never again be just another day.

Related stories:

Allison Hanes: Reflections on a misogynist massacre at Polytechnique

What’s changed 35 years after the Montreal massacre?

‘Name what things are’: Recognizing ‘femicide’ 35 years after the Montreal massacre

Montreal to shine with 15th beam in tribute to all murdered women on Polytechnique anniversary

Just Jen: Lessons in Resilience and Inclusion

Today, December 3, 2024, is International Day of Persons with Disabilities. This year’s theme is “Amplifying the leadership of persons with disabilities for an inclusive and sustainable future.” If anyone embodied the leadership traits required to ensure inclusivity of people with disabilities, it was certainly Jen Powley.

Jen was another author in my class (2015) for the master’s program in creative nonfiction writing. I remember arriving a day late for second-year summer residency. My daughter had gotten married on the first day of the residency, so I hadn’t left Vancouver until after the reception and had only arrived in Halifax in the wee hours of the morning. 

The next day, we had our mentor groups in the morning. Exhausted by my very late arrival, I took a nap on the lunch break and overslept. So I arrived late to the afternoon large group session and proceeded to go around on the break to say hello to people I hadn’t seen since the previous year. 

When I got to Jen, she didn’t recognize me. This wasn’t a surprise. She hadn’t been in my mentor group the previous year; her quadriplegia (caused by MS) prevented her from socializing much; and my social inhibition never helps with anything. So, I don’t know if I’d ever introduced myself to her.

Approaching her to say hello, I explained that I’d missed the welcome reception the previous day as I’d been at my daughter’s wedding. Without missing a beat or cracking a smile, she said, through her assistant, “And do you think that’s a good reason?” 

Jen was famous for her dry wit. Introducing her at a conference I later attended where she sat on a panel talking about disabilities, her first-year mentor, Lorri Nielsen Glenn, talked about her remarkable ability to, among other things, say a lot with very few words. I suspect Jen had an ability to zero in on the absurd long before she developed MS, but having difficulty finding the breath to speak honed her ability to “level a room,” as Glenn put it, in just a few syllables. 

Powley’s memoir, Just Jen: Thriving Through Multiple Sclerosis (Fernwood Publishing, 2017) takes us from her diagnosis at age 15 through her adult life, boyfriends, difficulties finding work, activism in the disability community, quadriplegia, and finding the love of her life, not to mention earning several academic degrees in her spare time. (The first time I met her, she dryly described her decision to embark on yet another degree as “much to my parents’ chagrin.”)

In a chapter called Engineering Families, Jen wrote: 

“Having hired twenty-seven assistants over eight years, I was accustomed to saying goodbye. Many of my assistants were students who didn’t stay for more than the years they were in school. Others simply moved on. Working one-on-one with my assistants, I came to know them well, but they usually only knew each other through the emails they typed for me. Some of my assistants met at shift change, but if one worked on Fridays and another worked Sundays, it was doubtful their paths would cross. Occasionally, I hosted barbecues for everyone who worked for me. Introducing themselves, they would say ‘Oh, you’re blah-blah at gmail.com. I’ve read your emails.’ The barbecues were meetings of the Jen community. I would say ‘knees’—to signal that I needed to be repositioned—and four people would get up to adjust me. 

“I engineer families out of strangers, and in the time my assistants spend as part of my family, I hope they see how strong someone who appears so fragile can be. I want them to go into the world as doctors, marine biologists, academics, librarians, and artists who know that differently-abled does not mean dumb or ill-tempered. I want them to raise their children with compassion, and if their mother or brother ever needs assistance, I want them to know they’re strong enough to step up and give it.” 

This book should be required reading for high school graduation because it helps readers learn some fundamental life skills: courage, humility, generousity, humour, compassion. At the least, I hope it’s used in some certificate, diploma, and degree programs for people who wish to work with those living with physical challenges. As Glenn wrote of her former student, “Trust this writer; she’s the real thing.” 

Published in 2017, two years after our graduation from the MFA program, Just Jen went on to become a finalist in the Atlantic Book Awards. Jen Powley died on September 17, 2023, leaving an incredible legacy of warmth, wit, and wisdom. I didn’t know her well, but I know she’s missed. 

Other books on disability:

One Strong Girl: Surviving the Unimaginable—A Mother’s Memoir, by S. Leslie Buxton.

I Don’t Do Disability: And Other Lies I’ve Told Myself, by Adelle Purdham.

Scream Therapy: A Punk Journey through Mental Health, by Jason Schreurs.

The Space Between 

I wrote this piece for my initial assignment in the MFA program at University of King’s College. I offer it in honour of Remembrance Day and of my father, Dick Melcombe, who died more than 50 years ago. I still think of you every day, Dad.

Edited to add: Someone, somewhere commented on the lifetime of grief I’ve lived with after losing my dad so young. Truer words. Not a Remembrance Day goes by that I don’t give in to my tears and allow myself the luxury of sobbing for a while.

A picture hangs in my living room, a sort of collage, but more organized, befitting its contents. It includes my father’s Royal Canadian Air Force wings and stripes from World War II, a green-and-gold RCAF emblem he embroidered while in traction for months in a veterans’ hospital, and two black-and-white photos, rimmed in gold. The pieces are carefully arranged against dark-blue cloth, framed in gun-metal grey with dignified flecks of gold. The photo on the left, taken before my father shipped out to England in 1942, depicts a handsome, athletic, optimistic, young man in his NCO uniform. To the right are his wings and stripes, a few threads out of place. From the photo on the right, the face I remember smiles out at me in his Pilot Officer uniform at the time of his medical discharge in 1945, still a handsome man.

In the first, he’s twenty-one. In the second, he looks much more than three years older.

There is more than my fathers’ wings and stripes in the space between those photos. There’s a story I only thought I knew until years after he died. By that time, decades had passed since a spring day when I’d shouted angry words at him, words I don’t quite remember, but will never really forget. By the time I understood how wrong they were, it was too late for anything but regret.

I wasn’t the first in my family to lose a father too soon. My father’s father died three years into the Great Depression. At eleven, he became sole support for his demanding mother and five-year-old brother. At sixteen, when he grew too old to continue working as an errand boy after school, he took a full-time job as a clerk at the Hudson’s Bay Company and finished high school through evening classes.

He signed up for the reserves in 1940, a few months after his nineteenth birthday; my mother once told me that, more than anything else, he wanted to get away from his mother and train for a career as an airline pilot. He was called up in 1941, spent a year in flight training, shipped out in 1942, and spent another year in combat training before being assigned a crew and active duty.

I learned much of this from his service records, which I requested from the Library and Archives of Canada in March 2011. My nephew had been studying World War II in school and had expressed an interest. In the meantime, like a lot of aging children of World War II veterans, I’d begun to see that not everything is as clear as I once thought it was—that not all wars are the same any more than all peace is the same. I’d begun looking at my adult son and seeing my father at the same age, hearing stories of Afghan veterans struggling to return to a normal life, and wondering how my father had appeared to cope so well. So I requested his records, hoping to fill in some blanks, unprepared for the large, brown envelope that arrived a few months later.

A few days after it arrived, I sat in my sunny yellow kitchen with my older sister reading through his application papers, and the reports at various stages of his flight training. The comments from his training officers read like dialogue out of an old war flick; I can picture the officers in their high-waisted pants, sitting at desks in barracks offices, smoking pipes while tapping away with two fingers at manual typewriters. “A good sort of lad,” wrote one. “Never flown at all but very keen to be a Pilot . . . should turn out all right.” “His day duel was done in cross-wind conditions but immediately the weather cleared, he improved rapidly,” another wrote. “Captaincy on cross-country flying was good. Accomplished one nickel [an aerobatic loop] successfully.” A third said simply, “Appears to be of the slow steady type, reliable.”

Reliable. That was my dad. Reliable.

Twenty-five years after the war, in the summer of 1970, I was thirteen. My biggest aspiration for the future was to be a hippie, and my main occupation in the present was to hate my father. I had no reason; it just seemed like the thing to do at the time. I knew he’d been in combat, though that was nothing to brag about then, with anti-Vietnam war sentiment at its height. He never talked about the war, anyway. He liked the movie, The Great Escape, a fictionalized version of a real-life escape attempt as told by Paul Brickhill in his eponymous book. He laughed uproariously at the TV series, Hogan’s Heroes, a sitcom set in a Nazi POW camp. He once said to my sister, after they’d watched The Longest Day, “So that’s what it was like below the cloud cover on D-Day,” the day the Allied Forces invaded Normandy, which ultimately marked the turning point in the war. One day when I was fifteen and had grown out of hating him, my parents and I were leaving for the airport, where they were seeing me off on my school’s spring break trip to Paris and London, a far cry from the kind of European trip he’d experienced. We were running late, and my dad was scrupulously punctual, so I was surprised when he stopped, grabbed a scrap of paper, and scrawled in his barely legible handwriting, “Millie Walters, 33 Hawkesbury Way, West Wickham, Kent.”

“What’s this?” I asked.

“My Aunt Millie,” he said.

“You have an Aunt Millie?” I asked, “In England?”

“Yes. I used to visit her when I was on leave. Give her a call. Tell her your Dick’s daughter.”

That was it. That was all I ever heard him say about the three years between those two photos.

In June 1987, fifteen years after my father’s death, I received a letter and short story from a man I’d never heard of: Frank Devine, a member of my father’s crew. With two babies in and out of the hospital and an aging, ailing mother, I never got around to replying—another regret. But I kept the letter; it provided reference points when I requested my father’s records. In it, Frank described himself as “the Mad Irishman Wop/A.G. jammed between three Cannucks and three Britts.” I hadn’t even known my father’s crew weren’t all Canadian. Frank and my dad had met in October 1943, Frank wrote, and flown together until six days after D-Day. “We taught [your Dad] to ride a bike at Pershore 23 Operational Training Unit, where the first five of us came together and flew in Wellingtons, Dick Melcombe (Titch) Pilot, Jack WestNavigator, St Pierre Bomb Aimer, Fred Bailey (Bill) Rear Gunner.”

Titch. My father had had a nickname. Titch.

At Pershore, Frank wrote, they picked up three new crew members: Jim Clement, Alf Deakin, and Harry Braithwaite. Even the names sound like characters from a 1940s war flick. They volunteered for the Pathfinders, a hand-picked corps of airmen with unparalleled navigational skills. The Pathfinders did precision target-marking, using coloured flares to ensure bombers hit targets accurately, which minimized civilian losses, and later dropping supplies to the Dutch. My father and his crew had volunteered for the 405, the lone Pathfinders unit in the RCAF, but it didn’t become operational until June 12, 1944—about six hours too late for my father’s crew, as it turned out.

In the meantime, they flew with the Ghost Squadron. It’s odd Frank didn’t mention it. I remembered my mother talking about it when I was a child, but as an adult I thought the name comical, and wondered if it might have been an imagined memory. But there it was with his records, on photocopied pages from a military history book. One of the most elite flying units in World War II Europe, the Ghost Squadron had earned its name both by flying night-only missions and by its reputation “for raining death and destruction down on the enemy”; its patch was a skull and crossbones. That gave me pause. It didn’t fit with the father I’d known, a man who’d hardly raised his voice except when watching Hockey Night in Canada. Crews had never served long with the squadron, my mother had said; it was too hard on them psychologically.

Maybe that was why Frank left it out.

In April 1944, after six months with the Ghost Squadron, while waiting for the Pathfinders 405 to take off, my father’s crew switched from Wellingtons to Lancasters. Considered “the pilot’s aircraft,” they were enormous, capable of carrying nearly their own weight again. These were the planes that dropped supplies to starving Dutch civilians in the last year of the war and later ferried 74,000 freed POWs back to England in just 24 days. That’s probably how my father made it back across the Channel. But Lancs were not built for comfort, or defense. Turrets for the gunners and bomb aimers were so small some

crew members had to put their flight boots inside and climb in before putting them on. At 20,000 feet, the temperature could drop so low that airmen returned to base with frostbite. And because they flew almost entirely at night, they had little armour.

Lancaster Bomber, considered a “pilot’s aircraft”
because it was nothing but essentials.
Photo: Cpl Phil Major ABIPP/MOD, OGL v1.0OGL v1.0,
via Wikimedia Commons.

Only the best pilots flew Lancasters. Only the most skilled crews became Pathfinders.

On a June day in 2011, I sat in my kitchen with my sister, flipping through pages from the big brown envelope, the morning sun flooding in. I’d made it past the mostly glowing comments from my father’s superiors to the actual service records, which were dark and hard to read, cramped writing in tiny lines detailing every post he’d ever been assigned and every mission he’d ever flown. I found my mind wandering from the bright day outside to a runway in England at night, imagining our dad in the cockpit of his Lanc.

No, that’s wrong: I was imagining my son. Though he’s now older than the man in the “before” photo, and taller, my son looks remarkably like his grandfather. He’s slight and fair-skinned and carries himself with self-assurance. I can see him sitting in the pilot’s chair, on an airfield lit by only a few runway lights. He’s checking gauges and chatting good-naturedly with his crew to put them at ease while internally focusing on the mission ahead. My father was a small man piloting a mammoth machine, a quiet, sensitive boy who’d been responsible for others for most of his life. He’d seen death as a child, having been in the car when his father was killed. He’d learned never to appear weak, especially to his mother. He’d grown up in a paradox, supporting his brother and mother, yet always under his mother’s thumb. At just twenty-two, he’d become responsible for the lives of the six young men under his command, and the deaths of countless others.

He was probably aware of that paradox, too. Later in life, he would tape messages to the dashboard of his car, reminding himself to have “Strength” and “Confidence” as he readied for the day ahead during his morning commute, donning a mask few people ever saw behind. His crew would never have seen. They would have seen nothing but a commander who took charge and took care of them. Even when they went drinking, Frank wrote, “his limit was two small beers, whilst the rest of us got sloshed, he always looked after us and we all admired him for resisting our devious efforts to get him Tipsy. You must realise that Bomber crews were as close knit as families, probably more so at times so you can appreciate how I feel about hearing that Dick has passed away.”

At thirteen, I didn’t know this. It wasn’t until forty years later that I applied for his records, and then sat at my kitchen table with my sister, comparing them against Frank’s letter, piecing together the time between those two photos and specifically the wee hours of June 12 1944. I knew about his life before the war, and had driven past his boyhood home in Vancouver’s varsity district. I knew how he’d met our mother after the war, a wounded veteran courting his nurse at Shaughnessy Hospital. But it wasn’t until years after his death, when my nephew asked about his grandfather and my son was considering enlisting to have medical school paid for, that the reality of the space between those two photos began to sink in.

They’d flown four missions in five days, Frank wrote, when they were shot down over German-occupied France. They hadn’t even had time to celebrate my dad’s promotion a few days earlier. On June 6 1944, they’d dropped bombs at Omaha, trying to give the troops who’d poured off the boats into hailstorms of bullets a chance to make it past the beach, over the dunes, into the forests. What my father hadn’t mentioned in that one-off comment to my sister was how difficult it must have been for all the Canadian flyers that day to realize it was cloud cover that had undermined their efforts. It wasn’t their fault they’d dropped their bombs too far behind the front lines, leaving many more bodies on the beach than anyone had imagined.

But it was war. The dead were dead. The living couldn’t bring them back. They could only move forward.

So on the morning of June 8, my father’s crew attacked German troops in the Fôret de Cerisy, and the following morning they hit Rennes airfield. On the night of June 11, they were called out at short notice to bomb a panzer division at Tours, where German forces had been called up from the south to reinforce the defences at Omaha beach, the codename for a beach in Normandy hit during the D-Day invasion. They were scheduled to drop their load at 00:45. I don’t know whether they did, because as Frank wrote, “We were hit at 00:45!”

Some sixty-five years later, feeling uneasy with the comforts of my kitchen and the sunshine-y day outside, I looked through page after page of statements by my dad’s crew, his superior officers, and even M. Maillet, the farmer in whose field he’d crashed, and I found myself unable to continue. The reports of his growing competence in training had been easy enough to read. Even Frank’s letter and his one-page account of the crash had not made the image of my father’s plane falling out of the night sky quite real to me. It had always been like something out of a movie—a black-and-white movie with officers smoking pipes and tapping on manual typewriters.

This was not a movie. This was survivor testimony. And my eyes were too full, my brain too overwhelmed, to read it. It was my sister, always more pragmatic than I, who grabbed a scrap of paper and began sifting through the pages, dissecting each man’s statement, extracting names and times, checking details against his service record, assembling the crew’s last moments together like pieces of a puzzle becoming a whole picture. I realized with some chagrin that, until then, that was all it had been to me. A fuzzy-edged picture I’d never gotten ‘round to focusing.

It was focused now.

They were between 1200 and 1500 feet when the first bullet hit. Braithwaite saw the fires in the inboard engines, dying down and growing again. 

The pilot’s training and experience kicked in: Adjust engine pitch. Shut off petrol. Press extinguisher button.

The fire in the starboard engine went out, but the one in the port engine grew, fast.

Deakin yelled, “Fire in the fuselage . . . and under the starboard wing.”

“What’s our height?” West shouted.

”Bale out!” the pilot answered.

Deakin led the way, headfirst out the rear door.

Clement went next, and West followed, out the front hatch.

Glancing out the rear, Braithwaite saw ground rushing toward him, stepped back, braced for impact.

He felt a bump as the plane hit the trees, then a slight rise: the pilot pulling the nose up? Then—blackness.

From hit to crash, it had been less than three minutes.

Braithwaite came to surrounded by flames.

Maillet had seen the explosion and raced toward it. As he neared, he saw a man run into the woods. No time to spare, Maillet hurried toward the plane.

Two airmen were unhurt in the burning wreck, but the pilot was badly wounded. Maillet beckoned to the airmen, who ran after him.

The pilot, head traumatized, leg pulverized, was still strapped into the burning cockpit, tracer from the ammunition belts flying around the fuselage like deadly fireworks.

By the time Maillet returned, the Germans had arrived. The pilot was gone.

The soldiers searched the farm but found no one. Maillet had hidden Baily and Braithwaite quickly, but well; they remained there undetected for the rest of the war.

I had known from the time I was quite young that my father had been a pilot in a war and had been in a big plane crash; that was why he limped, and why he wore those funny-looking shoes that he had to mail order from that special place. The story of the crash had been told over and over, in his absence, by those who hadn’t been there. It had grown to epic proportions.

Sitting in my kitchen with my sister, the real story hit.

Except for the year I’d decided to hate him, I had always imagined my father larger-than-life, the dad who never lost his cool or seemed afraid. I’d never considered what he might have been thinking as his aircraft took fire, as the flames grew, and the plane dove. I’d never heard his voice shouting the order to bale out, or felt the adrenaline pumping as he’d struggled to keep the plane aloft until he reached the trees at the edge of the farmer’s field, his only hope of surviving the crash. I’d never asked if he’d been conscious as he lay there in excruciating pain, immobilized by his injuries, wondering what would become of his crew now that he’d gotten them to the ground alive, now that all he could do was listen to the jeeps screaming toward him, the soldiers shouting in German, the young men whose comrades’ lives his own bombs may have taken dragging his wounded body from the cockpit. I’d never asked if he’d been unconscious after the plane crashed, unaware of what was happening until he’d been awoken by the screaming pain of the jeep hitting every bump in the road, or in the operating room before they put him out and set his leg so badly it would never be right again, or in a bed where French nurses took his pulse and German soldiers stood guard as he came slowly to realize that though he’d survived the crash, if he even remembered it, his life was now out of his hands.

There are no records of my father’s time as a POW. The next piece of paper in his file was a copy of the letter to his mother. “Dear Mrs. Melcombe: Before you receive this letter you will have had a telegram informing you that your son . . . is missing . . . [He] was very popular with this Squadron, and was an excellent Pilot. He is greatly missed . . . There is always the possibility that [he is] a prisoner of war . . .”

As I sat in my kitchen with my sister, the details sorted and my tears done, I read past the unlikely optimism in the last line and went back to the first few sentences: He was very popular. He was an excellent pilot. The past tense hit me like a slap, as it must have hit his mother. I thought of my own son, so much like his grandfather. I thought of him achieving his life’s dream of becoming a doctor and going off to Afghanistan to repay his debt, much as my father had become a pilot and then gone off to war.

A hole opened up in my heart.

Years earlier, to my adolescent mind, there had seemed to be no difference between an offensive war and a defensive one, between fighting a real threat and an imagined one. But as I grew older and learned more, I realized that though many leaders have tried many times in history to justify offensive wars by framing them as defensive, that was not the case in World War II. One can argue all day that Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini were the product of previous wars and atrocities, but I can’t persuade myself that once any individual has gone that far and diplomacy has been exhausted, those living with imminent threats are wrong to defend themselves.

To my middle-aged mind, the sheer madness of World War II Europe has little in common with the irrational fear of “the red dog of communism” that fuelled the Cold War and gave rise to the wars in Korea and Vietnam. But in my thirteen-year-old brain, I saw only the images of naked children burned by napalm and innocent villagers killed at My Lai that streamed into our living rooms each evening, and I conflated them with my ideas about World War II. In my wannabe flower-child thinking, I believed all wars were crimes and my father was a war criminal. In the years after he died, I knew he understood I was just being a teenager, I knew he’d always loved me and I him, I knew he had forgiven me for my thoughtless words. But it wasn’t until that day in my kitchen decades later, poring through his service records with my sister, that I felt deep down in my bones how far off base my adolescent appraisal of him had been, how much my outburst must have hurt him, how powerless he must have felt to respond.

Most of my father’s crew—Deakin, West, Baily, and Braithwaite—survived what remained of the war, but I don’t know anything else about them. According to my father’s records, Clement, the second to bale out, had initially been hidden by the French, but later captured, probably interrogated, and then shot by the Gestapo. Devine, whom Maillet had seen running into the woods, had been captured and hit by “friendly” fire en route to interrogation, but had survived the war and emigrated to Van Nuys, California, from where he’d sent that letter.

The whole story reads like a script from a war movie. But it wasn’t a movie; it was my father’s life. It was what I didn’t know when I was thirteen and intent on hating him because it was hip at the time, and I wanted to be hip, to be a hippie, to fit in. I couldn’t see then that war, like life, is full of paradoxes. At thirteen, in the middle of an argument I remember nothing else about, I shot out some of the most ignorant words I’ve ever said. I don’t remember them exactly now, but I’ve never forgotten the tone, the intent, the spirit.

I was reminded of them recently when watching an episode of M*A*S*H, the 1970s sitcom set at a mobile army surgical hospital during the Korean War, a sitcom that reflected America’s growing intolerance for the continuing and senseless US presence in Vietnam. In the scene of M*A*S*H that I mimicked during that argument with my father, Hawkeye Pierce, the charming rogue and brilliant chief surgeon who’d been drafted into a war he wanted nothing to do with, was talking to a pilot. The pilot was clean, friendly, and almost completely unscathed by the violence and death all around him. As the story told it, a bomber pilot wouldn’t need to see a war up close and personal. This bomber pilot flew high above it all, dropped his bombs, and made it home every evening to where his Japanese wife awaited him with slippers and a hot meal. In the story, the pilot hadn’t thought much about the war, it was just his current job—until one day he found himself sitting outside an operating room watching Korean children being carried past on litters, crying out for mothers and fathers who had been injured or killed themselves. It was just the moment the maverick surgeon, Hawkeye Pierce, had needed to give the heartless pilot a piece of his mind about what was going on down on the ground every time he dropped his bombs. His monologue was admirable, I thought at the time, his tone righteous and moral and right. And so, on that day when I was thirteen, in the middle of an argument with my father, I called the scene up from my memory and gave my father a piece of my mind.

“Why should I listen to you?” I demanded. “You’re a murderer. Did you ever think about the people you were killing on the ground? The children? The babies? Or did you just drop your bombs and fly home to dinner? I don’t need to listen to you. You’re a murderer. You’re a hypocrite. You’re a baby killer.”

My father was not easily riled. I think he lost his temper twice when we were kids, both times with me, but this was neither of those times. This time, he simply stood in our front yard in his gardening clothes and a scuffed-up pair of the orthopedic shoes he’d worn every day since he’d made it out of traction and begun walking on crutches, and then on canes, and finally on his own. He’d been left with a pronounced limp, back pain, and a complete inability to regain the athletic prowess he’d enjoyed as the handsome, optimistic young man in the “before” photo, or even to fulfill his dream of becoming an airline pilot.

The day I shot him down was warm, but he wasn’t wearing shorts because he was embarrassed by the brown scar that ran the length of his calf. He never talked about it. He just covered it up, the same way he covered everything up. All “the boys” were told not to talk about things when they got home. As Frank wrote, “I thought then, probably very selfishly, [talking about it] is doing no good . . . I will forget about the whole thing which I tried to do, but it is impossible to forget and now I know I was wrong to try. There is so much which should have been done and still should be done, so as in future years people will appreciate truly what the men in Bomber command went through . . . I feel so guilty now.”

Guilty. Frank Devine was guilty of nothing. Nor was my father. My father did as he was told, as he’d been taught to do all his life, as a boy who’d become a man at eleven, a pilot who’d saved every member of his crew at the risk of his own life, and a veteran who’d been told to forget and move on. He never talked about the war, not even on that day when I was thirteen. On that day, after those words shot out of my mouth like tracer around a burning fuselage, my father just stood there, no expression on his face. I don’t recall who walked away first, but I never forget that I spoke such vile, callous, ignorant words. I’ve never in my life said any words to anyone that I’vewished more I could take back.

My father died of a sudden heart attack three years later. He was fifty-two. I was sixteen. I’d grown up a little, and our relationship had improved a lot, but I’d never gotten around to apologizing.

For years after his death, I held onto his war mementoes. Every year on November 11 I’d take them out and look at the pictures and run my fingers over the stripes and the RCAF emblem. I’d tell my children what I remembered of their grandfather and what little I knew of the night he was shot down, and I’d go to their Remembrance Day assemblies at school and cry a little.

A few years ago, not long after receiving his service records, my youngest daughter had an idea for a Christmas gift for me: something meaningful, something I’d never expect. On Christmas morning, we did the rounds, taking turns opening gifts and thanking givers. At one point, I think my daughter said, “I know it doesn’t seem like you’re getting much, Mommy, but there’s something big coming for you at the end.”

I might have muttered, “Oh, really? I hadn’t noticed.”

Eventually, the pile under the tree was depleted. My daughter said, “Mom, there’s one gift left, for you. You didn’t get a lot this year because this was really expensive. It’s from all of us, but it was my idea.”

“Okay,” I said, bemused.

She left the room, reappearing a moment later with a large, flat, heavy parcel loosely wrapped in brown paper. “I didn’t wrap it,” she said, laying it on my lap. “Be careful,” she said. “It’s fragile.”

So I opened it carefully, pulling back one flap of brown paper, and then the other. And when I saw it—the wings, the photos, the RCAF emblem—I stopped breathing. My face got hot. Tears flooded down my cheeks. A sound choked out of my throat. My vision blurred at first, and then my eyes squeezed tightly shut. From a distance, I heard my daughter ask, “Do you like it, Mommy?”

“Yes,” I said. “I like it.”

But what I wanted to say, what I wanted one more chance to say, was “I love you, Daddy. I miss you. I’m sorry.”

Now that picture, that collage, hangs in my living room. I look every day at the young man who went to war and the much older man who came home, and I know the story that fills the space between those two photos. Every year on November 11, I take out Frank’s letter and read it, wishing I’d gotten around to replying before it was too late, and lingering over the closing lines: “Bye for now great to be in touch with you after all these years I hope you will regard me as an uncle. God bless and protect you. Sincerely yours, Frank”.