The Complex Emotional Terrain of Gift-Giving

I’ve long been intrigued by rules and expectations around gift-giving. In my family growing up, gift-giving was uncomplicated. You bought or made something you thought the recipient would like. 

Your only expectation in giving it was that the recipient would appreciate the thought that went into it even if they didn’t appreciate the gift itself. And if there was something specific about the gift that didn’t work—it was the wrong size, or you already had one—it was not a personal sleight for the recipient to exchange it for something that worked. 

I had no idea gifts could be used to hurt people until I was an adult. Then I met my husband’s mother. I don’t recall her giving me anything for Christmas or my birthday for the first three years I was with her son; why would she? We lived together (unmarried) and I was the wrong faith (atheist). She didn’t like me. 

Scissors, ribbon, and paper to wrap a gift.

We got married on December 7, 1983. For Christmas that year, we flew from Vancouver, where we’d moved after my mother had a health crisis, to Kingston, where my partner had grown up and his mother still lived. It was our first Christmas with his family since he’d moved away from them two years earlier.

For Christmas, my MIL gave me a nightgown and a housecoat. The nightgown was an odd choice because she knew I slept in the nude; I ignored the obvious hint. I did need a new housecoat, and I tried to be grateful for this one (and wore it until it wore out) even though it wasn’t at all my style. 

A few days later, I saw both garments on sale at Woolworth’s, the nightgown for $9.99 and the housecoat for $19.99. This would have been a day or two after my husband’s birthday, for which she gave him a plush, Pierre Cardin housecoat with the $60 price tag still pinned into the neck. (This was 1983, when $60 was worth about a billion in today’s dollars.) I’m not sure how she could have given me a more obvious message that marrying into her family did not mean that I was on the same level as anyone else in the family, a message my husband confirmed was likely exactly what she meant. After that, she only gave me gifts if my husband pushed her to. A few years later, he told her that he’d taken to sharing his annual birthday cheque from her 50/50 with me. Shortly after that, she stopped sending him anything.

One family member on my side was an absolute genius at buying gifts. She loved flea markets and kept her eyes open year-round for gifts her loved ones, especially the young children, might enjoy. She didn’t always hit the mark, but even when she was miles off base, we all valued her gifts because we knew she put a tremendous amount of thought into them. Unfortunately, she and her partner were not always as good at receiving gifts. I think they assumed that because we always showered them with praise for the gifts they offered, knowing this meant a great deal to them, they assumed that they always hit the mark. They further assumed that if others didn’t hit the mark with them, that meant they weren’t trying very hard.

Silver ribbon tied in a bow.

They were not easy to buy for. But on one occasion, I thought I really had gotten it right with a colourful wall hanging in a particular South American folk style. The look of disappointment on their faces when they opened it said everything. At some point, they said they didn’t want to exchange gifts anymore because they couldn’t afford it, and I’m sure that was part of it. But I think it was also that we could just never figure out what they’d appreciate, and they grew tired of that.

In the past few years, I admit I’ve begun to tire of gift giving. Our annual Christmas wish list has turned into a list of hyperlinks to exactly the gift the individual wants. I’ve never been a fan of buying gifts because I like them regardless of whether I think the recipient will like them. But neither am I a fan of people being so particular about what they want that all the mystery and surprise of gift-giving is gone. I

This brings me to the latest issue, which started with one person refusing a gift. They had a reason, which I didn’t understand, but it was a cash gift, so it was easy enough to redeposit. Months later, when I thought the reason for refusing the gift had passed—my bad for not checking my assumptions—I brought back gifts from a trip that I planned to give everyone for Christmas. I needed to give one of the gifts a good deal sooner than Christmas because it would spoil.

The intended recipient took pains to refuse my gifts in a very polite text. But I still found their refusal … confusing. I ended up giving the spoilable item to someone else. As to the other item, the would-be recipient suggested that I enjoy it myself. But I would never buy something at that price point for myself. So, I’ve decided to keep it for them. It will only improve with age. If they won’t accept it before I die, I’ll leave it to them in my will. 

I have to say again that the person who refused my gifts was not in any way rude in the way they refused them. Yet I’ve still spent a lot of time puzzling over my own hurt response to this. It’s been suggested to me that no one is obligated to accept a gift, which is certainly true. It’s been suggested that my difficulty in accepting this refusal is the opposite of showing love. It’s been suggested that I shouldn’t allow gift-giving to become a source of conflict.

I’ll be perfectly honest in saying I don’t know what’s right, but the whole situation led me to thinking about gift-giving in general. So I did a bit of research (emphasis on “a bit”).

Gift-giving goes back millennia and serves a variety of purposes: gifts to gods in exchange for a bountiful harvest or an edge in battle. Gifts to leaders of other clans or tribes or nations to establish friendship and trust. Gifts at weddings to bless the marriage with fecundity, at births to pray for long and happy life, at anniversaries and birthdays to express a wish for more of the same. 

The most famous anthropologist to study gift-giving was Marcel Mauss, who wrote an essay, appropriately called “The Gift“, that examines the ways gift exchange builds social and economic relationships. Mauss’s student, the famous Claude Lévi-Strauss, posited that structures such as kinship systems, commerce, and gift exchange are similar across cultures. Other anthropologists and psychologists have noted that in building social and economic bonds—yes, the value of the gifts exchanged is part of it, in much the same way that the food served and clothing worn at a state event are part of it—gifts form part of the glue that binds cultures, and individuals, together.

A web page called “The Psychology of Gifting” lists a half-dozen reasons why people give gifts: to build and reinforce relationships, to show love and devotion, for symbolic communication, to receive something in return, to help others, or to find a mate. It also lists four main types of gifts: those that are symbolic of the giver and receiver, those that are symbolic of the giver’s knowledge of the receiver, those that are symbolic of the occasion, and those that contain an array of significant meanings.

There’s a reason virtually every national capital in the world has an inventory of gifts received from other nations, gifts no one will ever use because they belong to no one person and that’s not their function. Such gifts are offers of friendship and trust, offers for two nations to let down their guard and establish mutually beneficial relationships.

Similarly, personal gift-giving is an act of both reaching out and welcoming in. We let down our guard, show our vulnerability. In giving a gift, we hope the recipient will receive it in the spirit in which it’s intended. The harder we work at finding the perfect gift, the greater our anticipation of the recipient’s pleasure—and the deeper our disappointment if it’s not received with the joy we’d hoped for.

When people don’t show their appreciation for a gift, much less when they simply refuse it, it hurts. And it hurts all the more because the gift-giver’s guard is already down. Rejection of the gift feels very much like personal rejection.

Sometimes in a scenario like that, people express their hurt by getting angry and looking for explanations. What happened to what they thought was a mutually trusting and caring relationship? And that hurts even more. 

What’s especially interesting to me about this situation is that I, as the person whose gift has been refused, am considered the one who’s at fault. Why am I making something out of nothing? Who am I to make the other person feel bad? If only I would have accepted the rejection without saying anything, everything would have been all right. There’s no responsibility on the person who refused the gift to recognize how that might have felt to me. There’s only a responsibility on me to accept the rejection graciously.

I still believe gift exchange, whether it’s interpersonal or international, is valuable.

It left me wondering, briefly, if gift-giving is worth it, if letting down one’s guard is worth it. 

I still think it is. Although I’m still feeling hurt about the current situation, which has ballooned out of all proportion at a time of year when, in my culture, we’re supposed to be appreciating one another, I still believe gift exchange, whether it’s interpersonal or international, is valuable. Just as I think, and history demonstrates, that gift exchange serves many valuable purposes, talking through misunderstandings in gift exchange provide an equally valuable opportunity to communicate about our differences and similarities and come to new understandings.

But to do that, both parties need to agree to set aside hard feelings and listen to those they’ve hurt. That’s never easy. But another thing I’ve always believed is that the harder things are to do, the more worthwhile they’re likely to be. So I’ll wait until the other party is ready to talk, and then I’ll listen and hope they’ll do the same.

Reflections on the December 6 Massacre: A Personal Account

I wrote this piece years ago about the impact the December 6 massacre had on my life. It was published in The Ottawa Citizen on December 4, 1993, just four years after the massacre. Although there are a few things I’d change or add, for the most part it still resonates, so I thought I’d share it today on the anniversary of the 1989 massacre of 14 women at École Polytechnique. 

One night a few years ago I lay frightened in bed. Someone in the parking lot was throwing something repeatedly at my window. While my rational side felt it was just a friendly prank, my mother-bear instinct told me to restrain my curious three-year-old from going to look. What if more than a mischievous smile came through the window, but a brick—or worse?

I’d seen a news feature on violence against women that night. Two weeks earlier, I’d wept over the death of my dog, a Doberman that had provided me with comfort and security for nine years.

During that time, I had almost forgotten the menacing possibilities of unexplained creaks and groans in the floor boards of an aging home. For the first time in years, I remembered what it was like to feel unsafe in my own bed. My little girl curled up to me and said, “Mommy, I wish Blue didn’t die. I wish Daddy was home.”

My children’s father is by no means perfect, but like an increasing number of his peers, he has decided that respect for others and ongoing self-examination should be a cornerstone of his life. Here is a man who is light years beyond “helping out.” He does his share. When I wanted a home birth, he trusted my instinct. When he heard a disc jockey make light of “Take Back the Night” activities, he registered his complaint with the station management.

That night, I agreed with my daughter. I wished her Daddy was home.

The wish, and the fear, lasted only moments. The lock rattled. The front door opened. Footsteps mounted the darkened stairs. A mans’ form paused outside my half-open bedroom door before pushing it open.

“Hi honey, I’m home,” my husband whispered. “Didn’t you hear me throwing things at the window?”

It was the night of Dec. 6, the second anniversary of Marc Lepine’s massacre of 14 women, and the first national day of memorial to female victims of male violence.

“I got lots of comments on my white ribbon today,” he said. “The women were pleased to see it. A couple of the guys wished they’d thought of it. I was surprised how many of the kids knew what it meant. Did anyone comment on yours?”

Heart still racing, I replied no, no one had taken notice.

We live in a word in which property ownership is wealth and wealth is power; in which 80 per cent of the work, paid or unpaid, is done by women, while 99 per cent of the property is owned by men; in which men have the ability to exert both fiscal and physical power over women; in which Marc Lepine is far from alone in instilling fear in women because of his choice to abuse that power.

In this work, it is incumbent upon me to understand life through the eyes of men like my father, who, though never abusive, believed and acted as if he was superior to my mother; men like the ones who abused me as a child, an adolescent, and a woman; even men, like my husband, who strive to behave differently, but don’t always know how.

There is no parallel requisite for them to see the world through my eyes.

My husband’s actions that night are illustrative. He requires neither physical, emotional, nor fiscal superiority over me in order to feel masculine. While he wishes that the economic value of children-rearing was recognized, he respects its intrinsic value as much as if I received remuneration. He does not silently tolerate sexist remarks.

On that December evening, this man committed an act of awareness: He wore a white ribbon. Then he came home and committed an act of unawareness.

Acting aware is a good first step. But for my husband to be aware of what it is to be a woman in 20th-century North America, he must find a way to experience the fear that I live with every day. The panic to which I’ve grown accustomed through years of practice. The heart-quickening anxiety I feel when a guy in a muscle car slows down to take a better look, when heavy footsteps quicken behind me on an empty street, when a stranger—or even a neighbour—knocks on my door in the middle of an evening when I’m home alone, not even a dog to keep me company.

As I lay frightened in bed that night a few years ago, I reviewed my choices: Stay put or go look. If I looked, I knew I’d probably see a friendly smile; or I might be confronted by a man reminded by that evening’s newscasts of his anger at women. If I stayed put, I could be teaching fear to my daughter; or I could be assured that I was protecting the two of us from anger that strikes enough ordinary Canadian women to fill a room in the time it takes to watch a Schwarzenegger video.

If I looked, I might later hear a police officer, doctor or judge berating me for taking unnecessary chances, for assuming that my own home could protect me and my young children from harm. If I stayed put, I could hear the voice in my own head chastising me for consenting to live my life in fear.

Being aware of every move, every minute is the reality of the world through women’s eyes. It is a reality I try daily to share with my husband, one he must find a way to learn and share with other men if it is to change in his little girl’s lifetime. It’s the reason that men like him, who start by wearing white ribbons on Dec. 6, must not stop there.

It’s why Dec. 6 will never again be just another day.

Related stories:

Allison Hanes: Reflections on a misogynist massacre at Polytechnique

What’s changed 35 years after the Montreal massacre?

‘Name what things are’: Recognizing ‘femicide’ 35 years after the Montreal massacre

Montreal to shine with 15th beam in tribute to all murdered women on Polytechnique anniversary

Just Jen: Lessons in Resilience and Inclusion

Today, December 3, 2024, is International Day of Persons with Disabilities. This year’s theme is “Amplifying the leadership of persons with disabilities for an inclusive and sustainable future.” If anyone embodied the leadership traits required to ensure inclusivity of people with disabilities, it was certainly Jen Powley.

Jen was another author in my class (2015) for the master’s program in creative nonfiction writing. I remember arriving a day late for second-year summer residency. My daughter had gotten married on the first day of the residency, so I hadn’t left Vancouver until after the reception and had only arrived in Halifax in the wee hours of the morning. 

The next day, we had our mentor groups in the morning. Exhausted by my very late arrival, I took a nap on the lunch break and overslept. So I arrived late to the afternoon large group session and proceeded to go around on the break to say hello to people I hadn’t seen since the previous year. 

When I got to Jen, she didn’t recognize me. This wasn’t a surprise. She hadn’t been in my mentor group the previous year; her quadriplegia (caused by MS) prevented her from socializing much; and my social inhibition never helps with anything. So, I don’t know if I’d ever introduced myself to her.

Approaching her to say hello, I explained that I’d missed the welcome reception the previous day as I’d been at my daughter’s wedding. Without missing a beat or cracking a smile, she said, through her assistant, “And do you think that’s a good reason?” 

Jen was famous for her dry wit. Introducing her at a conference I later attended where she sat on a panel talking about disabilities, her first-year mentor, Lorri Nielsen Glenn, talked about her remarkable ability to, among other things, say a lot with very few words. I suspect Jen had an ability to zero in on the absurd long before she developed MS, but having difficulty finding the breath to speak honed her ability to “level a room,” as Glenn put it, in just a few syllables. 

Powley’s memoir, Just Jen: Thriving Through Multiple Sclerosis (Fernwood Publishing, 2017) takes us from her diagnosis at age 15 through her adult life, boyfriends, difficulties finding work, activism in the disability community, quadriplegia, and finding the love of her life, not to mention earning several academic degrees in her spare time. (The first time I met her, she dryly described her decision to embark on yet another degree as “much to my parents’ chagrin.”)

In a chapter called Engineering Families, Jen wrote: 

“Having hired twenty-seven assistants over eight years, I was accustomed to saying goodbye. Many of my assistants were students who didn’t stay for more than the years they were in school. Others simply moved on. Working one-on-one with my assistants, I came to know them well, but they usually only knew each other through the emails they typed for me. Some of my assistants met at shift change, but if one worked on Fridays and another worked Sundays, it was doubtful their paths would cross. Occasionally, I hosted barbecues for everyone who worked for me. Introducing themselves, they would say ‘Oh, you’re blah-blah at gmail.com. I’ve read your emails.’ The barbecues were meetings of the Jen community. I would say ‘knees’—to signal that I needed to be repositioned—and four people would get up to adjust me. 

“I engineer families out of strangers, and in the time my assistants spend as part of my family, I hope they see how strong someone who appears so fragile can be. I want them to go into the world as doctors, marine biologists, academics, librarians, and artists who know that differently-abled does not mean dumb or ill-tempered. I want them to raise their children with compassion, and if their mother or brother ever needs assistance, I want them to know they’re strong enough to step up and give it.” 

This book should be required reading for high school graduation because it helps readers learn some fundamental life skills: courage, humility, generousity, humour, compassion. At the least, I hope it’s used in some certificate, diploma, and degree programs for people who wish to work with those living with physical challenges. As Glenn wrote of her former student, “Trust this writer; she’s the real thing.” 

Published in 2017, two years after our graduation from the MFA program, Just Jen went on to become a finalist in the Atlantic Book Awards. Jen Powley died on September 17, 2023, leaving an incredible legacy of warmth, wit, and wisdom. I didn’t know her well, but I know she’s missed. 

Other books on disability:

One Strong Girl: Surviving the Unimaginable—A Mother’s Memoir, by S. Leslie Buxton.

I Don’t Do Disability: And Other Lies I’ve Told Myself, by Adelle Purdham.

Scream Therapy: A Punk Journey through Mental Health, by Jason Schreurs.

The Space Between 

I wrote this piece for my initial assignment in the MFA program at University of King’s College. I offer it in honour of Remembrance Day and of my father, Dick Melcombe, who died more than 50 years ago. I still think of you every day, Dad.

Edited to add: Someone, somewhere commented on the lifetime of grief I’ve lived with after losing my dad so young. Truer words. Not a Remembrance Day goes by that I don’t give in to my tears and allow myself the luxury of sobbing for a while.

A picture hangs in my living room, a sort of collage, but more organized, befitting its contents. It includes my father’s Royal Canadian Air Force wings and stripes from World War II, a green-and-gold RCAF emblem he embroidered while in traction for months in a veterans’ hospital, and two black-and-white photos, rimmed in gold. The pieces are carefully arranged against dark-blue cloth, framed in gun-metal grey with dignified flecks of gold. The photo on the left, taken before my father shipped out to England in 1942, depicts a handsome, athletic, optimistic, young man in his NCO uniform. To the right are his wings and stripes, a few threads out of place. From the photo on the right, the face I remember smiles out at me in his Pilot Officer uniform at the time of his medical discharge in 1945, still a handsome man.

In the first, he’s twenty-one. In the second, he looks much more than three years older.

There is more than my fathers’ wings and stripes in the space between those photos. There’s a story I only thought I knew until years after he died. By that time, decades had passed since a spring day when I’d shouted angry words at him, words I don’t quite remember, but will never really forget. By the time I understood how wrong they were, it was too late for anything but regret.

I wasn’t the first in my family to lose a father too soon. My father’s father died three years into the Great Depression. At eleven, he became sole support for his demanding mother and five-year-old brother. At sixteen, when he grew too old to continue working as an errand boy after school, he took a full-time job as a clerk at the Hudson’s Bay Company and finished high school through evening classes.

He signed up for the reserves in 1940, a few months after his nineteenth birthday; my mother once told me that, more than anything else, he wanted to get away from his mother and train for a career as an airline pilot. He was called up in 1941, spent a year in flight training, shipped out in 1942, and spent another year in combat training before being assigned a crew and active duty.

I learned much of this from his service records, which I requested from the Library and Archives of Canada in March 2011. My nephew had been studying World War II in school and had expressed an interest. In the meantime, like a lot of aging children of World War II veterans, I’d begun to see that not everything is as clear as I once thought it was—that not all wars are the same any more than all peace is the same. I’d begun looking at my adult son and seeing my father at the same age, hearing stories of Afghan veterans struggling to return to a normal life, and wondering how my father had appeared to cope so well. So I requested his records, hoping to fill in some blanks, unprepared for the large, brown envelope that arrived a few months later.

A few days after it arrived, I sat in my sunny yellow kitchen with my older sister reading through his application papers, and the reports at various stages of his flight training. The comments from his training officers read like dialogue out of an old war flick; I can picture the officers in their high-waisted pants, sitting at desks in barracks offices, smoking pipes while tapping away with two fingers at manual typewriters. “A good sort of lad,” wrote one. “Never flown at all but very keen to be a Pilot . . . should turn out all right.” “His day duel was done in cross-wind conditions but immediately the weather cleared, he improved rapidly,” another wrote. “Captaincy on cross-country flying was good. Accomplished one nickel [an aerobatic loop] successfully.” A third said simply, “Appears to be of the slow steady type, reliable.”

Reliable. That was my dad. Reliable.

Twenty-five years after the war, in the summer of 1970, I was thirteen. My biggest aspiration for the future was to be a hippie, and my main occupation in the present was to hate my father. I had no reason; it just seemed like the thing to do at the time. I knew he’d been in combat, though that was nothing to brag about then, with anti-Vietnam war sentiment at its height. He never talked about the war, anyway. He liked the movie, The Great Escape, a fictionalized version of a real-life escape attempt as told by Paul Brickhill in his eponymous book. He laughed uproariously at the TV series, Hogan’s Heroes, a sitcom set in a Nazi POW camp. He once said to my sister, after they’d watched The Longest Day, “So that’s what it was like below the cloud cover on D-Day,” the day the Allied Forces invaded Normandy, which ultimately marked the turning point in the war. One day when I was fifteen and had grown out of hating him, my parents and I were leaving for the airport, where they were seeing me off on my school’s spring break trip to Paris and London, a far cry from the kind of European trip he’d experienced. We were running late, and my dad was scrupulously punctual, so I was surprised when he stopped, grabbed a scrap of paper, and scrawled in his barely legible handwriting, “Millie Walters, 33 Hawkesbury Way, West Wickham, Kent.”

“What’s this?” I asked.

“My Aunt Millie,” he said.

“You have an Aunt Millie?” I asked, “In England?”

“Yes. I used to visit her when I was on leave. Give her a call. Tell her your Dick’s daughter.”

That was it. That was all I ever heard him say about the three years between those two photos.

In June 1987, fifteen years after my father’s death, I received a letter and short story from a man I’d never heard of: Frank Devine, a member of my father’s crew. With two babies in and out of the hospital and an aging, ailing mother, I never got around to replying—another regret. But I kept the letter; it provided reference points when I requested my father’s records. In it, Frank described himself as “the Mad Irishman Wop/A.G. jammed between three Cannucks and three Britts.” I hadn’t even known my father’s crew weren’t all Canadian. Frank and my dad had met in October 1943, Frank wrote, and flown together until six days after D-Day. “We taught [your Dad] to ride a bike at Pershore 23 Operational Training Unit, where the first five of us came together and flew in Wellingtons, Dick Melcombe (Titch) Pilot, Jack WestNavigator, St Pierre Bomb Aimer, Fred Bailey (Bill) Rear Gunner.”

Titch. My father had had a nickname. Titch.

At Pershore, Frank wrote, they picked up three new crew members: Jim Clement, Alf Deakin, and Harry Braithwaite. Even the names sound like characters from a 1940s war flick. They volunteered for the Pathfinders, a hand-picked corps of airmen with unparalleled navigational skills. The Pathfinders did precision target-marking, using coloured flares to ensure bombers hit targets accurately, which minimized civilian losses, and later dropping supplies to the Dutch. My father and his crew had volunteered for the 405, the lone Pathfinders unit in the RCAF, but it didn’t become operational until June 12, 1944—about six hours too late for my father’s crew, as it turned out.

In the meantime, they flew with the Ghost Squadron. It’s odd Frank didn’t mention it. I remembered my mother talking about it when I was a child, but as an adult I thought the name comical, and wondered if it might have been an imagined memory. But there it was with his records, on photocopied pages from a military history book. One of the most elite flying units in World War II Europe, the Ghost Squadron had earned its name both by flying night-only missions and by its reputation “for raining death and destruction down on the enemy”; its patch was a skull and crossbones. That gave me pause. It didn’t fit with the father I’d known, a man who’d hardly raised his voice except when watching Hockey Night in Canada. Crews had never served long with the squadron, my mother had said; it was too hard on them psychologically.

Maybe that was why Frank left it out.

In April 1944, after six months with the Ghost Squadron, while waiting for the Pathfinders 405 to take off, my father’s crew switched from Wellingtons to Lancasters. Considered “the pilot’s aircraft,” they were enormous, capable of carrying nearly their own weight again. These were the planes that dropped supplies to starving Dutch civilians in the last year of the war and later ferried 74,000 freed POWs back to England in just 24 days. That’s probably how my father made it back across the Channel. But Lancs were not built for comfort, or defense. Turrets for the gunners and bomb aimers were so small some

crew members had to put their flight boots inside and climb in before putting them on. At 20,000 feet, the temperature could drop so low that airmen returned to base with frostbite. And because they flew almost entirely at night, they had little armour.

Lancaster Bomber, considered a “pilot’s aircraft”
because it was nothing but essentials.
Photo: Cpl Phil Major ABIPP/MOD, OGL v1.0OGL v1.0,
via Wikimedia Commons.

Only the best pilots flew Lancasters. Only the most skilled crews became Pathfinders.

On a June day in 2011, I sat in my kitchen with my sister, flipping through pages from the big brown envelope, the morning sun flooding in. I’d made it past the mostly glowing comments from my father’s superiors to the actual service records, which were dark and hard to read, cramped writing in tiny lines detailing every post he’d ever been assigned and every mission he’d ever flown. I found my mind wandering from the bright day outside to a runway in England at night, imagining our dad in the cockpit of his Lanc.

No, that’s wrong: I was imagining my son. Though he’s now older than the man in the “before” photo, and taller, my son looks remarkably like his grandfather. He’s slight and fair-skinned and carries himself with self-assurance. I can see him sitting in the pilot’s chair, on an airfield lit by only a few runway lights. He’s checking gauges and chatting good-naturedly with his crew to put them at ease while internally focusing on the mission ahead. My father was a small man piloting a mammoth machine, a quiet, sensitive boy who’d been responsible for others for most of his life. He’d seen death as a child, having been in the car when his father was killed. He’d learned never to appear weak, especially to his mother. He’d grown up in a paradox, supporting his brother and mother, yet always under his mother’s thumb. At just twenty-two, he’d become responsible for the lives of the six young men under his command, and the deaths of countless others.

He was probably aware of that paradox, too. Later in life, he would tape messages to the dashboard of his car, reminding himself to have “Strength” and “Confidence” as he readied for the day ahead during his morning commute, donning a mask few people ever saw behind. His crew would never have seen. They would have seen nothing but a commander who took charge and took care of them. Even when they went drinking, Frank wrote, “his limit was two small beers, whilst the rest of us got sloshed, he always looked after us and we all admired him for resisting our devious efforts to get him Tipsy. You must realise that Bomber crews were as close knit as families, probably more so at times so you can appreciate how I feel about hearing that Dick has passed away.”

At thirteen, I didn’t know this. It wasn’t until forty years later that I applied for his records, and then sat at my kitchen table with my sister, comparing them against Frank’s letter, piecing together the time between those two photos and specifically the wee hours of June 12 1944. I knew about his life before the war, and had driven past his boyhood home in Vancouver’s varsity district. I knew how he’d met our mother after the war, a wounded veteran courting his nurse at Shaughnessy Hospital. But it wasn’t until years after his death, when my nephew asked about his grandfather and my son was considering enlisting to have medical school paid for, that the reality of the space between those two photos began to sink in.

They’d flown four missions in five days, Frank wrote, when they were shot down over German-occupied France. They hadn’t even had time to celebrate my dad’s promotion a few days earlier. On June 6 1944, they’d dropped bombs at Omaha, trying to give the troops who’d poured off the boats into hailstorms of bullets a chance to make it past the beach, over the dunes, into the forests. What my father hadn’t mentioned in that one-off comment to my sister was how difficult it must have been for all the Canadian flyers that day to realize it was cloud cover that had undermined their efforts. It wasn’t their fault they’d dropped their bombs too far behind the front lines, leaving many more bodies on the beach than anyone had imagined.

But it was war. The dead were dead. The living couldn’t bring them back. They could only move forward.

So on the morning of June 8, my father’s crew attacked German troops in the Fôret de Cerisy, and the following morning they hit Rennes airfield. On the night of June 11, they were called out at short notice to bomb a panzer division at Tours, where German forces had been called up from the south to reinforce the defences at Omaha beach, the codename for a beach in Normandy hit during the D-Day invasion. They were scheduled to drop their load at 00:45. I don’t know whether they did, because as Frank wrote, “We were hit at 00:45!”

Some sixty-five years later, feeling uneasy with the comforts of my kitchen and the sunshine-y day outside, I looked through page after page of statements by my dad’s crew, his superior officers, and even M. Maillet, the farmer in whose field he’d crashed, and I found myself unable to continue. The reports of his growing competence in training had been easy enough to read. Even Frank’s letter and his one-page account of the crash had not made the image of my father’s plane falling out of the night sky quite real to me. It had always been like something out of a movie—a black-and-white movie with officers smoking pipes and tapping on manual typewriters.

This was not a movie. This was survivor testimony. And my eyes were too full, my brain too overwhelmed, to read it. It was my sister, always more pragmatic than I, who grabbed a scrap of paper and began sifting through the pages, dissecting each man’s statement, extracting names and times, checking details against his service record, assembling the crew’s last moments together like pieces of a puzzle becoming a whole picture. I realized with some chagrin that, until then, that was all it had been to me. A fuzzy-edged picture I’d never gotten ‘round to focusing.

It was focused now.

They were between 1200 and 1500 feet when the first bullet hit. Braithwaite saw the fires in the inboard engines, dying down and growing again. 

The pilot’s training and experience kicked in: Adjust engine pitch. Shut off petrol. Press extinguisher button.

The fire in the starboard engine went out, but the one in the port engine grew, fast.

Deakin yelled, “Fire in the fuselage . . . and under the starboard wing.”

“What’s our height?” West shouted.

”Bale out!” the pilot answered.

Deakin led the way, headfirst out the rear door.

Clement went next, and West followed, out the front hatch.

Glancing out the rear, Braithwaite saw ground rushing toward him, stepped back, braced for impact.

He felt a bump as the plane hit the trees, then a slight rise: the pilot pulling the nose up? Then—blackness.

From hit to crash, it had been less than three minutes.

Braithwaite came to surrounded by flames.

Maillet had seen the explosion and raced toward it. As he neared, he saw a man run into the woods. No time to spare, Maillet hurried toward the plane.

Two airmen were unhurt in the burning wreck, but the pilot was badly wounded. Maillet beckoned to the airmen, who ran after him.

The pilot, head traumatized, leg pulverized, was still strapped into the burning cockpit, tracer from the ammunition belts flying around the fuselage like deadly fireworks.

By the time Maillet returned, the Germans had arrived. The pilot was gone.

The soldiers searched the farm but found no one. Maillet had hidden Baily and Braithwaite quickly, but well; they remained there undetected for the rest of the war.

I had known from the time I was quite young that my father had been a pilot in a war and had been in a big plane crash; that was why he limped, and why he wore those funny-looking shoes that he had to mail order from that special place. The story of the crash had been told over and over, in his absence, by those who hadn’t been there. It had grown to epic proportions.

Sitting in my kitchen with my sister, the real story hit.

Except for the year I’d decided to hate him, I had always imagined my father larger-than-life, the dad who never lost his cool or seemed afraid. I’d never considered what he might have been thinking as his aircraft took fire, as the flames grew, and the plane dove. I’d never heard his voice shouting the order to bale out, or felt the adrenaline pumping as he’d struggled to keep the plane aloft until he reached the trees at the edge of the farmer’s field, his only hope of surviving the crash. I’d never asked if he’d been conscious as he lay there in excruciating pain, immobilized by his injuries, wondering what would become of his crew now that he’d gotten them to the ground alive, now that all he could do was listen to the jeeps screaming toward him, the soldiers shouting in German, the young men whose comrades’ lives his own bombs may have taken dragging his wounded body from the cockpit. I’d never asked if he’d been unconscious after the plane crashed, unaware of what was happening until he’d been awoken by the screaming pain of the jeep hitting every bump in the road, or in the operating room before they put him out and set his leg so badly it would never be right again, or in a bed where French nurses took his pulse and German soldiers stood guard as he came slowly to realize that though he’d survived the crash, if he even remembered it, his life was now out of his hands.

There are no records of my father’s time as a POW. The next piece of paper in his file was a copy of the letter to his mother. “Dear Mrs. Melcombe: Before you receive this letter you will have had a telegram informing you that your son . . . is missing . . . [He] was very popular with this Squadron, and was an excellent Pilot. He is greatly missed . . . There is always the possibility that [he is] a prisoner of war . . .”

As I sat in my kitchen with my sister, the details sorted and my tears done, I read past the unlikely optimism in the last line and went back to the first few sentences: He was very popular. He was an excellent pilot. The past tense hit me like a slap, as it must have hit his mother. I thought of my own son, so much like his grandfather. I thought of him achieving his life’s dream of becoming a doctor and going off to Afghanistan to repay his debt, much as my father had become a pilot and then gone off to war.

A hole opened up in my heart.

Years earlier, to my adolescent mind, there had seemed to be no difference between an offensive war and a defensive one, between fighting a real threat and an imagined one. But as I grew older and learned more, I realized that though many leaders have tried many times in history to justify offensive wars by framing them as defensive, that was not the case in World War II. One can argue all day that Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini were the product of previous wars and atrocities, but I can’t persuade myself that once any individual has gone that far and diplomacy has been exhausted, those living with imminent threats are wrong to defend themselves.

To my middle-aged mind, the sheer madness of World War II Europe has little in common with the irrational fear of “the red dog of communism” that fuelled the Cold War and gave rise to the wars in Korea and Vietnam. But in my thirteen-year-old brain, I saw only the images of naked children burned by napalm and innocent villagers killed at My Lai that streamed into our living rooms each evening, and I conflated them with my ideas about World War II. In my wannabe flower-child thinking, I believed all wars were crimes and my father was a war criminal. In the years after he died, I knew he understood I was just being a teenager, I knew he’d always loved me and I him, I knew he had forgiven me for my thoughtless words. But it wasn’t until that day in my kitchen decades later, poring through his service records with my sister, that I felt deep down in my bones how far off base my adolescent appraisal of him had been, how much my outburst must have hurt him, how powerless he must have felt to respond.

Most of my father’s crew—Deakin, West, Baily, and Braithwaite—survived what remained of the war, but I don’t know anything else about them. According to my father’s records, Clement, the second to bale out, had initially been hidden by the French, but later captured, probably interrogated, and then shot by the Gestapo. Devine, whom Maillet had seen running into the woods, had been captured and hit by “friendly” fire en route to interrogation, but had survived the war and emigrated to Van Nuys, California, from where he’d sent that letter.

The whole story reads like a script from a war movie. But it wasn’t a movie; it was my father’s life. It was what I didn’t know when I was thirteen and intent on hating him because it was hip at the time, and I wanted to be hip, to be a hippie, to fit in. I couldn’t see then that war, like life, is full of paradoxes. At thirteen, in the middle of an argument I remember nothing else about, I shot out some of the most ignorant words I’ve ever said. I don’t remember them exactly now, but I’ve never forgotten the tone, the intent, the spirit.

I was reminded of them recently when watching an episode of M*A*S*H, the 1970s sitcom set at a mobile army surgical hospital during the Korean War, a sitcom that reflected America’s growing intolerance for the continuing and senseless US presence in Vietnam. In the scene of M*A*S*H that I mimicked during that argument with my father, Hawkeye Pierce, the charming rogue and brilliant chief surgeon who’d been drafted into a war he wanted nothing to do with, was talking to a pilot. The pilot was clean, friendly, and almost completely unscathed by the violence and death all around him. As the story told it, a bomber pilot wouldn’t need to see a war up close and personal. This bomber pilot flew high above it all, dropped his bombs, and made it home every evening to where his Japanese wife awaited him with slippers and a hot meal. In the story, the pilot hadn’t thought much about the war, it was just his current job—until one day he found himself sitting outside an operating room watching Korean children being carried past on litters, crying out for mothers and fathers who had been injured or killed themselves. It was just the moment the maverick surgeon, Hawkeye Pierce, had needed to give the heartless pilot a piece of his mind about what was going on down on the ground every time he dropped his bombs. His monologue was admirable, I thought at the time, his tone righteous and moral and right. And so, on that day when I was thirteen, in the middle of an argument with my father, I called the scene up from my memory and gave my father a piece of my mind.

“Why should I listen to you?” I demanded. “You’re a murderer. Did you ever think about the people you were killing on the ground? The children? The babies? Or did you just drop your bombs and fly home to dinner? I don’t need to listen to you. You’re a murderer. You’re a hypocrite. You’re a baby killer.”

My father was not easily riled. I think he lost his temper twice when we were kids, both times with me, but this was neither of those times. This time, he simply stood in our front yard in his gardening clothes and a scuffed-up pair of the orthopedic shoes he’d worn every day since he’d made it out of traction and begun walking on crutches, and then on canes, and finally on his own. He’d been left with a pronounced limp, back pain, and a complete inability to regain the athletic prowess he’d enjoyed as the handsome, optimistic young man in the “before” photo, or even to fulfill his dream of becoming an airline pilot.

The day I shot him down was warm, but he wasn’t wearing shorts because he was embarrassed by the brown scar that ran the length of his calf. He never talked about it. He just covered it up, the same way he covered everything up. All “the boys” were told not to talk about things when they got home. As Frank wrote, “I thought then, probably very selfishly, [talking about it] is doing no good . . . I will forget about the whole thing which I tried to do, but it is impossible to forget and now I know I was wrong to try. There is so much which should have been done and still should be done, so as in future years people will appreciate truly what the men in Bomber command went through . . . I feel so guilty now.”

Guilty. Frank Devine was guilty of nothing. Nor was my father. My father did as he was told, as he’d been taught to do all his life, as a boy who’d become a man at eleven, a pilot who’d saved every member of his crew at the risk of his own life, and a veteran who’d been told to forget and move on. He never talked about the war, not even on that day when I was thirteen. On that day, after those words shot out of my mouth like tracer around a burning fuselage, my father just stood there, no expression on his face. I don’t recall who walked away first, but I never forget that I spoke such vile, callous, ignorant words. I’ve never in my life said any words to anyone that I’vewished more I could take back.

My father died of a sudden heart attack three years later. He was fifty-two. I was sixteen. I’d grown up a little, and our relationship had improved a lot, but I’d never gotten around to apologizing.

For years after his death, I held onto his war mementoes. Every year on November 11 I’d take them out and look at the pictures and run my fingers over the stripes and the RCAF emblem. I’d tell my children what I remembered of their grandfather and what little I knew of the night he was shot down, and I’d go to their Remembrance Day assemblies at school and cry a little.

A few years ago, not long after receiving his service records, my youngest daughter had an idea for a Christmas gift for me: something meaningful, something I’d never expect. On Christmas morning, we did the rounds, taking turns opening gifts and thanking givers. At one point, I think my daughter said, “I know it doesn’t seem like you’re getting much, Mommy, but there’s something big coming for you at the end.”

I might have muttered, “Oh, really? I hadn’t noticed.”

Eventually, the pile under the tree was depleted. My daughter said, “Mom, there’s one gift left, for you. You didn’t get a lot this year because this was really expensive. It’s from all of us, but it was my idea.”

“Okay,” I said, bemused.

She left the room, reappearing a moment later with a large, flat, heavy parcel loosely wrapped in brown paper. “I didn’t wrap it,” she said, laying it on my lap. “Be careful,” she said. “It’s fragile.”

So I opened it carefully, pulling back one flap of brown paper, and then the other. And when I saw it—the wings, the photos, the RCAF emblem—I stopped breathing. My face got hot. Tears flooded down my cheeks. A sound choked out of my throat. My vision blurred at first, and then my eyes squeezed tightly shut. From a distance, I heard my daughter ask, “Do you like it, Mommy?”

“Yes,” I said. “I like it.”

But what I wanted to say, what I wanted one more chance to say, was “I love you, Daddy. I miss you. I’m sorry.”

Now that picture, that collage, hangs in my living room. I look every day at the young man who went to war and the much older man who came home, and I know the story that fills the space between those two photos. Every year on November 11, I take out Frank’s letter and read it, wishing I’d gotten around to replying before it was too late, and lingering over the closing lines: “Bye for now great to be in touch with you after all these years I hope you will regard me as an uncle. God bless and protect you. Sincerely yours, Frank”.

Run, Hide, Repeat: A Memoir of a Fugitive Childhood, by Pauline Dakin

I remember when Pauline Dakin gave her pitch to the class of 2015. We were the inaugural class of the MFA in Creative Nonfiction program at University of King’s College. That meant that everything that first year was a bit of an experiment, with about 20 of us as very willing, very excited lab rats. We’d arrived on a Sunday in August, spent a day getting oriented, and thereafter went into our mentor groups for three hours every morning and whole-group sessions in the afternoons. We started our pitches on the second or third afternoon. 

Book cover shows a family snapshot of two children, a girl of about 6 and a boy of about 4, playing on a sun-drenched beach.

I was intimidated by my classmates. I was a nobody who’d done a dozen years of freelance journalism, much of it for magazines no one had heard of, followed by a dozen years of communications for small not-for-profits, overlapping with a dozen years of copy editing. The rest of the class included a reporter from CBC’s The National, a former assistant editor of Chatelaine, a published novelist on staff at The Walrus, and a graduate of UBC’s esteemed BFA in Creative Writing—writers who were way out of my league.

Pauline was one of them. A long-time health reporter with CBC Radio, she pitched a timely and well-researched idea about the health impacts of screen time on the growing brains of children and youth. It would have made a timely and interesting book. But then she said she had another idea. She’d been toying with it for quite a while, but she wasn’t sure. 

Finally, she shared the story of her unusual childhood. As she spoke, the room fell still and silent. After she finished, someone said something like, “I-I really like your first idea but, but your second idea—wow! Yeah, uh, do that one.” 

Pauline might have been the first of us to get a book deal, the result being the bestselling Run, Hide, Repeat: A Memoir of a Fugitive Childhood (Viking, 2017, 2022). The book flap says: “Pauline Dakin spent her childhood on the run. Without warning, her mother twice uprooted her and her brother, moving thousands of miles away from family and friends. Disturbing events interrupt their outwardly normal life: break-ins, car thefts, even physical attacks on a family friend. Many years later, her mother finally revealed they’d been running from the Mafia and were receiving protection from a covert anti-organized crime task force.

“But the truth was even more bizarre. Gradually, Dakin’s fears give way to suspicion. She puts her journalistic training to work and discovers that the Mafia threat was actually an elaborate web of lies. As she revisits her past, Dakin discovers the human capacity for betrayal and deception, and the power of love to forgive.” 

Run, Hide, Repeat is the kind of page-turner you stay awake half the night to finish, all the more compelling because every word is true. Winner of the 2018 Edna Staebler Award for Creative Non-Fiction and shortlisted for several other awards, Run, Hide, Repeat was re-released in 2022 to coincide with its launch as a five-part CBC podcast.

Recalling that afternoon pitch session for an article on cbc.ca about the podcast, Pauline says “I did my big pitch [on the impact of screen time on children and adolescents] and everyone nodded. And then, I just stood there. I didn’t know this was coming; I said, ‘Can I pitch you another story?’ …  I just told this group of strangers and I was just trembling as I told it. Of course, I finished and they were all looking at me with eyes as big as pie plates going, ‘yeah you should write that one!’

“Even then … I didn’t dive right in. I waffled back and forth over two years about which book I was writing. Ultimately, this was the one. I am so glad I did because I think the act of telling the secret, of being loud about the secret, undid some of the damage of the secret. … Eventually I came to feel that not holding secrets lets you let go. It’s the secrets that are so toxic.”

Books can have such amazing ability to challenge the way you think, make you feel things you didn’t know you could feel, teach you things you never dreamed of learning. Run, Hide, Repeat is the epitome of all that. A powerful book, and I’m proud to number the author among my friends.  

Books about family, for better and worse:

The View from Coffin Ridge: A Childhood Exhumed, by Gwen Lamont.

How to Clean a Fish: And Other Adventures in Portugal, by Esmeralda Cabral.

Acadian Driftwood: One Family and the Great Expulsion, by Tyler LeBlanc.

Still, I Cannot Save You: A Memoir of Sisterhood, Love, and Letting Go, by Kelly S. Thompson.

One Strong Girl, S. Lesley Buxton

[Note: I’d planned to write about Pauline Dakin’s book, Run, Hide, Repeat, in this post until I realized that Lesley Buxton is giving a webinar in less than a week. See end of post for details and link.]

I knew of Lesley Buxton before I met her. A friend and colleague of mine in Ottawa, where Lesley lived at the time, had shared the unimaginable story of her losing her only child to a rare neurological disease. This had happened just over a year before she began the MFA program (class of 2016). I was, and remain, in awe of her resilience. 

I remember when Lesley began writing her book, One Strong Girl: Surviving the Unimaginable—a Mother’s Memoir (Pottersfield Press, 2018). She didn’t want to tell her story in chronological order because everyone would know the ending before they began. 

Instead, the book opens a few months after her daughter, India, has died. She and her husband are on a plane to Japan, with which India was obsessed, to celebrate what would have been her seventeenth birthday. They’d had a speck of their daughter’s ashes baked into 16 colourful glass beads that they planned to leave in places she would have loved to visit. When I heard this story, I thought that was a far better idea than anything else I could think of doing with the memory of a child, especially one who’d seemed destined to do creative and interesting things. 

Lesley’s story then goes back to a time when India was just 10 years old. It’s the day the first symptom of India’s illness appeared, remarkable only for the fact that Lesley had a dental appointment that day, until India inexplicably fell. Their journey began, the journey that every parent hopes will never begin for them. 

From there, the story moves back and forth in time, sort of the way grief moves back and forth, taking us from the present to a memory in the distant past to thoughts of the future to a memory in the recent past, in no particular order. 

“Mark and I decided, when we headed west through the States to Vancouver, a stop on our way to Japan, that if we wanted something, we’d treat ourselves. By the time we returned to Quebec in the middle of June, the back seat of our car was heaving with souvenirs … 

“In Gibson’s, British Columbia, I bought myself a dress on a whim. The dress had a halter top and a wide 1950s skirt. It was sky blue and covered with pirate flags. I knew she would approve, though she probably would have told me it was too low cut. 

“I never censored India’s taste. A romantic with a flair for the dramatic, she favoured Manga-inspired outfits over low-cut t-shirts and short skirts. She often looked as if she’d stepped out of an anime movie.

“We still have her clothes. Everything is packed in big blue Tupperware boxes. Among them, a cream-coloured satin Regent style wedding dress she liked because it looked like it belonged to a Jane Austen character, and a Goth evening gown which, when she was sick, she used to watch TV in. I have no idea what will become of these things.

“Whenever I buy clothes, the first thing I ask myself is if India would approve. She was very opinionated about how I should dress. Once when I was wearing white pants, she told me, ‘Mummy, you can’t wear white. You’re not Beyonce.’ I’m not sure what I said, but I’m pretty sure I laughed. Now I don’t ever wear white. Too afraid. India might strike me down with a lightning bolt.”

A few years after India died, Lesley and her husband, Mark, moved out to BC, where her sister and parents still live. A few years after that, Mark was diagnosed with cancer; he died in 2022. I remember being in awe of Lesley’s attitude after he passed. I live with depression and often struggle with thoughts of suicide, and all three of my children are still alive and well. I don’t know how I would manage in Lesley’s circumstances. But a short while after Mark passed, Lesley wrote on Facebook that continuing to live well and enjoy life would be her way of honouring Mark and India. It’s what they would want for her. 

It’s no wonder India was one strong girl. Her mother is one strong woman. 

One Strong Girl won the first-ever Pottersfield Prize for Creative Nonfiction.  On Sunday October 27, 2024, Lesley Buxton will present a webinar, Scene Stealing: Creating Textured Scenes Using Your Five Senses, through the Federation of BC Writers. 

Other books about illness and disability:

Run, Hide, Repeat: A Memoir of a Fugitive Childhood, by Pauline Dakin.

Just Jen: Thriving Through Multiple Sclerosis, by Jen Powell.

I Don’t Do Disability and Other Lies I’ve Told Myself, by Adelle Purdham.

Still, I Cannot Save You: A Memoir of Sisterhood, Love, and Letting Go, by Kelly S. Thompson.